Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Cross-comparison · Comparison spans different vehicle types

2007 Mercury Mountaineer vs 2007 Suzuki VZR1800

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-05-07 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
The 2007 Mercury Mountaineer edges this one on reliability data

Reliability data favors the 2007 Mercury Mountaineer (3.9 versus 3.6). These vehicles aren't a typical head-to-head comparison, but if you're cross-shopping them, the data is what it is.

More reliable

2007 Mercury Mountaineer

3.9/5
Reliability score
81 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$9,250 repair exposure
vs

2007 Suzuki VZR1800

3.6/5
Reliability score
84 complaints
1 recalls (1 critical)
$6,650 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

The 2007 Mercury Mountaineer edges this comparison on reliability data (3.9 versus 3.6). These aren't a typical head-to-head, but if you're cross-shopping them, the data is what it is.

If you lean 2007 Mercury Mountaineer, know what you're getting into on electrical and cruise control. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2007 Suzuki VZR1800 sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2007 Suzuki VZR1800? Watch the powertrain and brakes. The 2007 Mercury Mountaineer has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 1.4x higher on the 2007 Mercury Mountaineer. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: pick based on use case more than the spec sheet. If you tow heavy and don't want to think about it, that's one calculation. If you're a daily driver and want the cheapest path forward, that's another. Both of these will get you down the road. We're just telling you where each one is most likely to break.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2007 Mercury Mountaineer
2007 Suzuki VZR1800
powertrain
23 reports
severe · ~$2,500
55 reports
severe · ~$2,500
brakes
No reports
18 reports
moderate · ~$450
engine
7 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
7 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
electrical
12 reports
moderate · ~$850
No reports
cruise control
4 reports
severe · ~$600
3 reports
moderate · ~$600
steering
5 reports
moderate · ~$700
No reports
body
3 reports
moderate · ~$1,500
No reports

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2007 Mercury Mountaineer or the 2007 Suzuki VZR1800?

Based on the NHTSA data we track, the 2007 Mercury Mountaineer comes out ahead with a reliability score of 3.9 versus 3.6. The margin is narrow, so the verdict could shift if you weight specific categories differently or factor in your own use case.

What goes wrong more often on the 2007 Mercury Mountaineer?

Compared to the 2007 Suzuki VZR1800, the 2007 Mercury Mountaineer sees more reported issues in electrical and cruise control. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2007 Suzuki VZR1800?

Compared to the 2007 Mercury Mountaineer, the 2007 Suzuki VZR1800 has more complaints in powertrain and brakes. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2007 Suzuki VZR1800 has more active recalls (1 vs 0). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $9,250 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →