Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Cross-comparison · Comparison spans different vehicle types

2008 acura TL vs 2008 toyota FJ Cruiser

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-05-03 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
The 2008 Toyota FJ Cruiser edges this one on reliability data

Reliability data favors the 2008 Toyota FJ Cruiser (3.9 versus 3.5). These vehicles aren't a typical head-to-head comparison, but if you're cross-shopping them, the data is what it is.

2008 acura TL

3.5/5
Reliability score
124 complaints
3 recalls (0 critical)
$12,050 repair exposure
vs
More reliable

2008 toyota FJ Cruiser

3.9/5
Reliability score
122 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$7,750 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

The 2008 Toyota FJ Cruiser edges this comparison on reliability data (3.9 versus 3.5). These aren't a typical head-to-head, but if you're cross-shopping them, the data is what it is.

If you lean 2008 Acura TL, know what you're getting into on airbags and steering. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2008 Toyota FJ Cruiser sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2008 Toyota FJ Cruiser? Watch the body and brakes. The 2008 Acura TL has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 1.6x higher on the 2008 Acura TL. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: pick based on use case more than the spec sheet. If you tow heavy and don't want to think about it, that's one calculation. If you're a daily driver and want the cheapest path forward, that's another. Both of these will get you down the road. We're just telling you where each one is most likely to break.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2008 acura TL
2008 toyota FJ Cruiser
body
11 reports
moderate · ~$1,500
32 reports
moderate · ~$1,500
brakes
4 reports
moderate · ~$450
30 reports
moderate · ~$450
airbags
33 reports
severe · ~$1,100
No reports
steering
26 reports
severe · ~$700
4 reports
moderate · ~$700
electrical
13 reports
severe · ~$850
3 reports
moderate · ~$850
suspension
5 reports
moderate · ~$900
11 reports
moderate · ~$900
seatbelts
No reports
13 reports
moderate · ~$500
powertrain
5 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
4 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
engine
7 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
No reports
visibility
No reports
5 reports
severe · ~$350

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2008 Acura TL or the 2008 Toyota FJ Cruiser?

Based on the NHTSA data we track, the 2008 Toyota FJ Cruiser comes out ahead with a reliability score of 3.9 versus 3.5. The margin is narrow, so the verdict could shift if you weight specific categories differently or factor in your own use case.

What goes wrong more often on the 2008 Acura TL?

Compared to the 2008 Toyota FJ Cruiser, the 2008 Acura TL sees more reported issues in airbags and steering. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2008 Toyota FJ Cruiser?

Compared to the 2008 Acura TL, the 2008 Toyota FJ Cruiser has more complaints in body and brakes. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2008 Acura TL has more active recalls (3 vs 0). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $12,050 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary auto-generated from the data and reviewed by ASE-certified contributors. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →