Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Cross-comparison · Comparison spans different vehicle types

2008 ford Crown Victoria vs 2008 mitsubishi Outlander

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-05-03 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
The 2008 Ford Crown Victoria edges this one on reliability data

Reliability data favors the 2008 Ford Crown Victoria (4.0 versus 3.8). These vehicles aren't a typical head-to-head comparison, but if you're cross-shopping them, the data is what it is.

More reliable

2008 ford Crown Victoria

4.0/5
Reliability score
50 complaints
1 recalls (0 critical)
$2,150 repair exposure
vs

2008 mitsubishi Outlander

3.8/5
Reliability score
57 complaints
2 recalls (0 critical)
$10,050 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

The 2008 Ford Crown Victoria edges this comparison on reliability data (4.0 versus 3.8). These aren't a typical head-to-head, but if you're cross-shopping them, the data is what it is.

If you lean 2008 Ford Crown Victoria, know what you're getting into on steering and cruise control. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander? Watch the suspension and powertrain. The 2008 Ford Crown Victoria has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 4.7x higher on the 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: pick based on use case more than the spec sheet. If you tow heavy and don't want to think about it, that's one calculation. If you're a daily driver and want the cheapest path forward, that's another. Both of these will get you down the road. We're just telling you where each one is most likely to break.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2008 ford Crown Victoria
2008 mitsubishi Outlander
steering
25 reports
critical · ~$700
No reports
cruise control
10 reports
severe · ~$600
3 reports
moderate · ~$600
electrical
5 reports
severe · ~$850
4 reports
severe · ~$850
suspension
No reports
9 reports
moderate · ~$900
powertrain
No reports
8 reports
severe · ~$2,500
engine
No reports
7 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
visibility
No reports
7 reports
moderate · ~$350
lighting
No reports
5 reports
moderate · ~$250
body
No reports
3 reports
moderate · ~$1,500

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2008 Ford Crown Victoria or the 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander?

Based on the NHTSA data we track, the 2008 Ford Crown Victoria comes out ahead with a reliability score of 4.0 versus 3.8. The margin is narrow, so the verdict could shift if you weight specific categories differently or factor in your own use case.

What goes wrong more often on the 2008 Ford Crown Victoria?

Compared to the 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander, the 2008 Ford Crown Victoria sees more reported issues in steering and cruise control. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander?

Compared to the 2008 Ford Crown Victoria, the 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander has more complaints in suspension and powertrain. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander has more active recalls (2 vs 1). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $10,050 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary auto-generated from the data and reviewed by ASE-certified contributors. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →