Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Different vehicle classes · Different segments — choice depends on use case

2008 Ford F-250 vs 2008 Nissan Pathfinder

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-05-03 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2008 Ford F-250 versus 2008 Nissan Pathfinder — different vehicles, different jobs

These two come from different segments, which makes a direct reliability comparison less meaningful than usual. Showing the data so you can see what each one is good at and where each one breaks down. The reliability scores (3.3 versus 3.5) reflect different testing populations and use patterns — don't treat them as apples-to-apples.

2008 Ford F-250

3.3/5
Reliability score
336 complaints
4 recalls (0 critical)
$13,950 repair exposure
vs

2008 Nissan Pathfinder

3.5/5
Reliability score
328 complaints
1 recalls (0 critical)
$11,550 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

These come from different vehicle segments, which means we're not declaring a winner here. The 2008 Ford F-250 scores 3.3; the 2008 Nissan Pathfinder scores 3.5. Different testing populations, different driving patterns, different categories of failure. Use the data below to understand what each one is good at and what each one breaks.

If you lean 2008 Ford F-250, know what you're getting into on steering and engine. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2008 Nissan Pathfinder sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2008 Nissan Pathfinder? Watch the powertrain and airbags. The 2008 Ford F-250 has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 1.2x higher on the 2008 Ford F-250. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: these are different categories of vehicle. Pick based on what you actually need it for. We're showing the reliability data so you can factor in long-term ownership cost, not pick a winner.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2008 Ford F-250
2008 Nissan Pathfinder
powertrain
16 reports
severe · ~$2,500
133 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
steering
119 reports
severe · ~$700
No reports
engine
65 reports
severe · ~$3,100
38 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
airbags
No reports
36 reports
severe · ~$1,100
electrical
17 reports
severe · ~$850
16 reports
moderate · ~$850
brakes
24 reports
moderate · ~$450
7 reports
moderate · ~$450
fuel system
No reports
31 reports
moderate · ~$1,200
tires
28 reports
severe · ~$150
No reports
suspension
15 reports
moderate · ~$900
6 reports
moderate · ~$900
body
10 reports
moderate · ~$1,500
No reports

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2008 Ford F-250 or the 2008 Nissan Pathfinder?

Based on the NHTSA data we track, the 2008 Nissan Pathfinder comes out ahead with a reliability score of 3.5 versus 3.3. The margin is narrow, so the verdict could shift if you weight specific categories differently or factor in your own use case.

What goes wrong more often on the 2008 Ford F-250?

Compared to the 2008 Nissan Pathfinder, the 2008 Ford F-250 sees more reported issues in steering and engine. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2008 Nissan Pathfinder?

Compared to the 2008 Ford F-250, the 2008 Nissan Pathfinder has more complaints in powertrain and airbags. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2008 Ford F-250 has more active recalls (4 vs 1). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $13,950 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →