Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Different vehicle classes · Different segments — choice depends on use case

2009 Acura MDX vs 2009 Ford F-350

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-05-03 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2009 Acura MDX versus 2009 Ford F-350 — different vehicles, different jobs

These two come from different segments, which makes a direct reliability comparison less meaningful than usual. Showing the data so you can see what each one is good at and where each one breaks down. The reliability scores (4.1 versus 4.0) reflect different testing populations and use patterns — don't treat them as apples-to-apples.

2009 Acura MDX

4.1/5
Reliability score
50 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$8,400 repair exposure
vs

2009 Ford F-350

4.0/5
Reliability score
46 complaints
1 recalls (0 critical)
$5,300 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

These come from different vehicle segments, which means we're not declaring a winner here. The 2009 Acura MDX scores 4.1; the 2009 Ford F-350 scores 4.0. Different testing populations, different driving patterns, different categories of failure. Use the data below to understand what each one is good at and what each one breaks.

If you lean 2009 Acura MDX, know what you're getting into on electrical and powertrain. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2009 Ford F-350 sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2009 Ford F-350? Watch the steering and suspension. The 2009 Acura MDX has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 1.6x higher on the 2009 Acura MDX. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: these are different categories of vehicle. Pick based on what you actually need it for. We're showing the reliability data so you can factor in long-term ownership cost, not pick a winner.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2009 Acura MDX
2009 Ford F-350
steering
No reports
16 reports
moderate · ~$700
electrical
14 reports
moderate · ~$850
No reports
engine
6 reports
severe · ~$3,100
6 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
powertrain
7 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
No reports
suspension
No reports
6 reports
moderate · ~$900
airbags
4 reports
severe · ~$1,100
No reports
cruise control
4 reports
severe · ~$600
No reports
brakes
No reports
4 reports
moderate · ~$450
tires
No reports
4 reports
moderate · ~$150
lighting
3 reports
moderate · ~$250
No reports

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2009 Acura MDX or the 2009 Ford F-350?

It's close to a tie. Both vehicles score within 0.2 points on our reliability index (4.1 vs 4.0). At this margin, either choice is defensible — base your decision on the specific failure modes that matter to you.

What goes wrong more often on the 2009 Acura MDX?

Compared to the 2009 Ford F-350, the 2009 Acura MDX sees more reported issues in electrical and powertrain. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2009 Ford F-350?

Compared to the 2009 Acura MDX, the 2009 Ford F-350 has more complaints in steering and suspension. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2009 Ford F-350 has more active recalls (1 vs 0). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $8,400 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →