2009 Chevrolet Colorado vs 2009 Subaru Legacy
Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.
2009 Chevrolet Colorado
2009 Subaru Legacy
Stories from the shop
Buyers cross-shop the 2009 Chevrolet Colorado and the 2009 Subaru Legacy but they're solving slightly different problems. The reliability data tells you what breaks on each one. The right pick depends on which set of trade-offs fits your actual driving more than which score is higher.
If you lean 2009 Chevrolet Colorado, know what you're getting into on electrical and fuel system. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2009 Subaru Legacy sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.
Going with the 2009 Subaru Legacy? Watch the airbags and engine. The 2009 Chevrolet Colorado has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.
Bottom line: pick based on use case more than the spec sheet. If you tow heavy and don't want to think about it, that's one calculation. If you're a daily driver and want the cheapest path forward, that's another. Both of these will get you down the road. We're just telling you where each one is most likely to break.
Side-by-side by problem area
Common questions
Which is more reliable, the 2009 Chevrolet Colorado or the 2009 Subaru Legacy?
It's close to a tie. Both vehicles score within 0.2 points on our reliability index (3.9 vs 3.7). At this margin, either choice is defensible — base your decision on the specific failure modes that matter to you.
What goes wrong more often on the 2009 Chevrolet Colorado?
Compared to the 2009 Subaru Legacy, the 2009 Chevrolet Colorado sees more reported issues in electrical and fuel system. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.
What goes wrong more often on the 2009 Subaru Legacy?
Compared to the 2009 Chevrolet Colorado, the 2009 Subaru Legacy has more complaints in airbags and engine. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.
Which has more recalls?
Both vehicles have 1 active recalls. Total recall count alone isn't a great signal — what matters is severity. See the recall counts by severity in the comparison table.
Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?
Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $7,000 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.