Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Different vehicle classes · Different segments — choice depends on use case

2009 Chevrolet Traverse vs 2009 Hyundai Sonata

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-05-07 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2009 Chevrolet Traverse versus 2009 Hyundai Sonata — different vehicles, different jobs

These two come from different segments, which makes a direct reliability comparison less meaningful than usual. Showing the data so you can see what each one is good at and where each one breaks down. The reliability scores (3.3 versus 3.5) reflect different testing populations and use patterns — don't treat them as apples-to-apples.

2009 Chevrolet Traverse

3.3/5
Reliability score
448 complaints
2 recalls (0 critical)
$12,700 repair exposure
vs

2009 Hyundai Sonata

3.5/5
Reliability score
459 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$15,050 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

These come from different vehicle segments, which means we're not declaring a winner here. The 2009 Chevrolet Traverse scores 3.3; the 2009 Hyundai Sonata scores 3.5. Different testing populations, different driving patterns, different categories of failure. Use the data below to understand what each one is good at and what each one breaks.

If you lean 2009 Chevrolet Traverse, know what you're getting into on steering and seatbelts. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2009 Hyundai Sonata sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2009 Hyundai Sonata? Watch the electrical and brakes. The 2009 Chevrolet Traverse has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 1.2x higher on the 2009 Hyundai Sonata. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: these are different categories of vehicle. Pick based on what you actually need it for. We're showing the reliability data so you can factor in long-term ownership cost, not pick a winner.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2009 Chevrolet Traverse
2009 Hyundai Sonata
steering
231 reports
moderate · ~$700
25 reports
moderate · ~$700
powertrain
46 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
40 reports
severe · ~$2,500
electrical
25 reports
severe · ~$850
52 reports
severe · ~$850
brakes
No reports
76 reports
moderate · ~$450
engine
33 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
33 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
airbags
22 reports
severe · ~$1,100
28 reports
severe · ~$1,100
cruise control
13 reports
moderate · ~$600
25 reports
severe · ~$600
body
No reports
31 reports
severe · ~$1,500
seatbelts
10 reports
moderate · ~$500
No reports
suspension
10 reports
severe · ~$900
No reports

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2009 Chevrolet Traverse or the 2009 Hyundai Sonata?

Based on the NHTSA data we track, the 2009 Hyundai Sonata comes out ahead with a reliability score of 3.5 versus 3.3. The margin is narrow, so the verdict could shift if you weight specific categories differently or factor in your own use case.

What goes wrong more often on the 2009 Chevrolet Traverse?

Compared to the 2009 Hyundai Sonata, the 2009 Chevrolet Traverse sees more reported issues in steering and seatbelts. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2009 Hyundai Sonata?

Compared to the 2009 Chevrolet Traverse, the 2009 Hyundai Sonata has more complaints in electrical and brakes. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2009 Chevrolet Traverse has more active recalls (2 vs 0). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $15,050 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →