Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Truck subsegment · Half-ton versus heavy-duty pickup

2009 Ford F-350 vs 2009 Nissan Titan

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-05-03 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2009 Ford F-350 versus 2009 Nissan Titan — half-ton or heavy-duty?

These are different tools for different jobs. The half-ton handles daily driving and light towing well; the heavy-duty handles serious payload and serious towing. Reliability data shows different failure patterns based on what each truck is asked to do. We'll surface both so you can match the truck to your actual workload.

2009 Ford F-350

4.0/5
Reliability score
46 complaints
1 recalls (0 critical)
$5,300 repair exposure
vs

2009 Nissan Titan

4.1/5
Reliability score
47 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$8,700 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

Different tools for different jobs. The 2009 Ford F-350 and the 2009 Nissan Titan are both pickups but engineered around different workloads. We're showing the reliability data on both so you can match the truck to what you actually use it for, not pick the one with the higher overall score.

If you lean 2009 Ford F-350, know what you're getting into on steering and suspension. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2009 Nissan Titan sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2009 Nissan Titan? Watch the brakes and airbags. The 2009 Ford F-350 has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 1.6x higher on the 2009 Nissan Titan. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Match the truck to the workload. The half-ton handles daily driving and weekend trailers; the heavy-duty handles serious work. Buying the wrong one for your use case costs more than buying either one of them outright.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2009 Ford F-350
2009 Nissan Titan
steering
16 reports
moderate · ~$700
3 reports
moderate · ~$700
engine
6 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
6 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
brakes
4 reports
moderate · ~$450
7 reports
severe · ~$450
airbags
No reports
7 reports
severe · ~$1,100
suspension
6 reports
moderate · ~$900
No reports
powertrain
No reports
5 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
tires
4 reports
moderate · ~$150
No reports
electrical
No reports
4 reports
severe · ~$850

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2009 Ford F-350 or the 2009 Nissan Titan?

It's close to a tie. Both vehicles score within 0.2 points on our reliability index (4.0 vs 4.1). At this margin, either choice is defensible — base your decision on the specific failure modes that matter to you.

What goes wrong more often on the 2009 Ford F-350?

Compared to the 2009 Nissan Titan, the 2009 Ford F-350 sees more reported issues in steering and suspension. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2009 Nissan Titan?

Compared to the 2009 Ford F-350, the 2009 Nissan Titan has more complaints in brakes and airbags. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2009 Ford F-350 has more active recalls (1 vs 0). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $8,700 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →