Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Different vehicle classes · Different segments — choice depends on use case

2009 Kia Optima vs 2009 Subaru Impreza

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-05-07 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2009 Kia Optima versus 2009 Subaru Impreza — different vehicles, different jobs

These two come from different segments, which makes a direct reliability comparison less meaningful than usual. Showing the data so you can see what each one is good at and where each one breaks down. The reliability scores (3.9 versus 3.9) reflect different testing populations and use patterns — don't treat them as apples-to-apples.

2009 Kia Optima

3.9/5
Reliability score
116 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$9,550 repair exposure
vs

2009 Subaru Impreza

3.9/5
Reliability score
112 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$11,650 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

These come from different vehicle segments, which means we're not declaring a winner here. The 2009 Kia Optima scores 3.9; the 2009 Subaru Impreza scores 3.9. Different testing populations, different driving patterns, different categories of failure. Use the data below to understand what each one is good at and what each one breaks.

If you lean 2009 Kia Optima, know what you're getting into on powertrain and airbags. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2009 Subaru Impreza sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2009 Subaru Impreza? Watch the engine and body. The 2009 Kia Optima has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 1.2x higher on the 2009 Subaru Impreza. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: these are different categories of vehicle. Pick based on what you actually need it for. We're showing the reliability data so you can factor in long-term ownership cost, not pick a winner.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2009 Kia Optima
2009 Subaru Impreza
powertrain
32 reports
severe · ~$2,500
27 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
airbags
22 reports
critical · ~$1,100
12 reports
severe · ~$1,100
engine
7 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
24 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
electrical
13 reports
severe · ~$850
8 reports
severe · ~$850
brakes
10 reports
severe · ~$450
4 reports
severe · ~$450
body
No reports
13 reports
severe · ~$1,500
cruise control
7 reports
moderate · ~$600
4 reports
moderate · ~$600
steering
7 reports
moderate · ~$700
No reports
lighting
6 reports
moderate · ~$250
No reports
fuel system
No reports
3 reports
severe · ~$1,200

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2009 Kia Optima or the 2009 Subaru Impreza?

It's close to a tie. Both vehicles score within 0.2 points on our reliability index (3.9 vs 3.9). At this margin, either choice is defensible — base your decision on the specific failure modes that matter to you.

What goes wrong more often on the 2009 Kia Optima?

Compared to the 2009 Subaru Impreza, the 2009 Kia Optima sees more reported issues in powertrain and airbags. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2009 Subaru Impreza?

Compared to the 2009 Kia Optima, the 2009 Subaru Impreza has more complaints in engine and body. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

Both vehicles have 0 active recalls. Total recall count alone isn't a great signal — what matters is severity. See the recall counts by severity in the comparison table.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $11,650 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →