Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Different vehicle classes · Different segments — choice depends on use case

2013 Buick LaCrosse vs 2013 Mazda Mazda3

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-05-03 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2013 Buick LaCrosse versus 2013 Mazda Mazda3 — different vehicles, different jobs

These two come from different segments, which makes a direct reliability comparison less meaningful than usual. Showing the data so you can see what each one is good at and where each one breaks down. The reliability scores (3.7 versus 3.9) reflect different testing populations and use patterns — don't treat them as apples-to-apples.

2013 Buick LaCrosse

3.7/5
Reliability score
126 complaints
1 recalls (0 critical)
$9,150 repair exposure
vs

2013 Mazda Mazda3

3.9/5
Reliability score
117 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$10,950 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

These come from different vehicle segments, which means we're not declaring a winner here. The 2013 Buick LaCrosse scores 3.7; the 2013 Mazda Mazda3 scores 3.9. Different testing populations, different driving patterns, different categories of failure. Use the data below to understand what each one is good at and what each one breaks.

If you lean 2013 Buick LaCrosse, know what you're getting into on electrical and steering. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2013 Mazda Mazda3 sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2013 Mazda Mazda3? Watch the powertrain and lighting. The 2013 Buick LaCrosse has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 1.2x higher on the 2013 Mazda Mazda3. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: these are different categories of vehicle. Pick based on what you actually need it for. We're showing the reliability data so you can factor in long-term ownership cost, not pick a winner.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2013 Buick LaCrosse
2013 Mazda Mazda3
electrical
34 reports
severe · ~$850
24 reports
moderate · ~$850
steering
23 reports
moderate · ~$700
9 reports
moderate · ~$700
suspension
27 reports
moderate · ~$900
No reports
powertrain
9 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
17 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
lighting
No reports
22 reports
moderate · ~$250
airbags
4 reports
severe · ~$1,100
7 reports
severe · ~$1,100
body
No reports
10 reports
severe · ~$1,500
engine
8 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
No reports
brakes
No reports
5 reports
severe · ~$450
seatbelts
No reports
5 reports
severe · ~$500

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2013 Buick LaCrosse or the 2013 Mazda Mazda3?

It's close to a tie. Both vehicles score within 0.2 points on our reliability index (3.7 vs 3.9). At this margin, either choice is defensible — base your decision on the specific failure modes that matter to you.

What goes wrong more often on the 2013 Buick LaCrosse?

Compared to the 2013 Mazda Mazda3, the 2013 Buick LaCrosse sees more reported issues in electrical and steering. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2013 Mazda Mazda3?

Compared to the 2013 Buick LaCrosse, the 2013 Mazda Mazda3 has more complaints in powertrain and lighting. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2013 Buick LaCrosse has more active recalls (1 vs 0). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $10,950 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →