Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

2016 jeep Wrangler vs 2016 subaru Forester

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-04-29 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
The 2016 Subaru Forester edges ahead clearly on reliability data

2016 jeep Wrangler

3.0/5
Reliability score
442 complaints
3 recalls (1 critical)
$12,050 repair exposure
vs
More reliable

2016 subaru Forester

3.5/5
Reliability score
401 complaints
1 recalls (0 critical)
$12,700 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

If you're putting a gun to my head, I'd take the 2016 subaru Forester. Reliability score's a solid 3.5 versus 3.0 on the 2016 jeep Wrangler, and the complaint counts back it up — 401 versus 442. That's not noise, that's a real gap.

If you're leaning 2016 jeep Wrangler, know what you're getting into on powertrain and engine. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than what the 2016 subaru Forester sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2016 subaru Forester? Watch the airbags and electrical. The 2016 jeep Wrangler has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

Bottom line: pick based on use case more than the spec sheet. If you tow heavy and don't want to think about it, that's one calculation. If you're a daily driver and want the cheapest path forward, that's another. Both of these will get you down the road. We're just telling you where each one is most likely to break.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2016 jeep Wrangler
2016 subaru Forester
airbags
62 reports
severe · ~$1,100
85 reports
severe · ~$1,100
electrical
46 reports
severe · ~$850
79 reports
severe · ~$850
powertrain
70 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
43 reports
severe · ~$2,500
engine
54 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
32 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
brakes
80 reports
moderate · ~$450
No reports
cruise control
21 reports
severe · ~$600
25 reports
severe · ~$600
steering
26 reports
moderate · ~$700
19 reports
severe · ~$700
visibility
No reports
21 reports
moderate · ~$350
body
17 reports
severe · ~$1,500
No reports
wheels
No reports
11 reports
severe · ~$400

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2016 Jeep Wrangler or the 2016 Subaru Forester?

Based on the NHTSA data we track, the 2016 Subaru Forester comes out ahead with a reliability score of 3.5 versus 3.0. The margin is clear, so the verdict could shift if you weight specific categories differently or factor in your own use case.

What goes wrong more often on the 2016 Jeep Wrangler?

Compared to the 2016 Subaru Forester, the 2016 Jeep Wrangler sees more reported issues in powertrain and engine. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2016 Subaru Forester?

Compared to the 2016 Jeep Wrangler, the 2016 Subaru Forester has more complaints in airbags and electrical. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2016 Jeep Wrangler has more active recalls (3 vs 1). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $12,700 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary auto-generated from the data and reviewed by ASE-certified contributors. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →