Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Different vehicle classes · Different segments — choice depends on use case

2007 GMC Acadia vs 2007 Mercedes-Benz E-Class

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-05-03 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2007 GMC Acadia versus 2007 Mercedes-Benz E-Class — different vehicles, different jobs

These two come from different segments, which makes a direct reliability comparison less meaningful than usual. Showing the data so you can see what each one is good at and where each one breaks down. The reliability scores (3.5 versus 3.5) reflect different testing populations and use patterns — don't treat them as apples-to-apples.

2007 GMC Acadia

3.5/5
Reliability score
431 complaints
1 recalls (0 critical)
$13,200 repair exposure
vs

2007 Mercedes-Benz E-Class

3.5/5
Reliability score
435 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$10,600 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

These come from different vehicle segments, which means we're not declaring a winner here. The 2007 GMC Acadia scores 3.5; the 2007 Mercedes-Benz E-Class scores 3.5. Different testing populations, different driving patterns, different categories of failure. Use the data below to understand what each one is good at and what each one breaks.

If you lean 2007 GMC Acadia, know what you're getting into on powertrain and steering. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2007 Mercedes-Benz E-Class sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2007 Mercedes-Benz E-Class? Watch the fuel system and engine. The 2007 GMC Acadia has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 1.2x higher on the 2007 GMC Acadia. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: these are different categories of vehicle. Pick based on what you actually need it for. We're showing the reliability data so you can factor in long-term ownership cost, not pick a winner.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2007 GMC Acadia
2007 Mercedes-Benz E-Class
powertrain
162 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
25 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
fuel system
No reports
103 reports
moderate · ~$1,200
steering
76 reports
moderate · ~$700
No reports
electrical
38 reports
severe · ~$850
18 reports
severe · ~$850
airbags
53 reports
severe · ~$1,100
No reports
engine
19 reports
severe · ~$3,100
25 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
visibility
15 reports
moderate · ~$350
6 reports
moderate · ~$350
body
16 reports
severe · ~$1,500
No reports
suspension
No reports
14 reports
moderate · ~$900
cruise control
9 reports
moderate · ~$600
No reports

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2007 GMC Acadia or the 2007 Mercedes-Benz E-Class?

It's close to a tie. Both vehicles score within 0.2 points on our reliability index (3.5 vs 3.5). At this margin, either choice is defensible — base your decision on the specific failure modes that matter to you.

What goes wrong more often on the 2007 GMC Acadia?

Compared to the 2007 Mercedes-Benz E-Class, the 2007 GMC Acadia sees more reported issues in powertrain and steering. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2007 Mercedes-Benz E-Class?

Compared to the 2007 GMC Acadia, the 2007 Mercedes-Benz E-Class has more complaints in fuel system and engine. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2007 GMC Acadia has more active recalls (1 vs 0). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $13,200 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →