Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Different vehicle classes · Different segments — choice depends on use case

2007 nissan Pathfinder vs 2007 toyota Tacoma

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-05-03 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2007 Nissan Pathfinder versus 2007 Toyota Tacoma — different vehicles, different jobs

These two come from different segments, which makes a direct reliability comparison less meaningful than usual. Showing the data so you can see what each one is good at and where each one breaks down. The reliability scores (3.5 versus 3.4) reflect different testing populations and use patterns — don't treat them as apples-to-apples.

2007 nissan Pathfinder

3.5/5
Reliability score
561 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$11,600 repair exposure
vs

2007 toyota Tacoma

3.4/5
Reliability score
540 complaints
1 recalls (0 critical)
$13,650 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

These come from different vehicle segments, which means we're not declaring a winner here. The 2007 Nissan Pathfinder scores 3.5; the 2007 Toyota Tacoma scores 3.4. Different testing populations, different driving patterns, different categories of failure. Use the data below to understand what each one is good at and what each one breaks.

If you lean 2007 Nissan Pathfinder, know what you're getting into on powertrain and engine. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2007 Toyota Tacoma sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2007 Toyota Tacoma? Watch the suspension and cruise control. The 2007 Nissan Pathfinder has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 1.2x higher on the 2007 Toyota Tacoma. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: these are different categories of vehicle. Pick based on what you actually need it for. We're showing the reliability data so you can factor in long-term ownership cost, not pick a winner.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2007 nissan Pathfinder
2007 toyota Tacoma
powertrain
220 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
59 reports
severe · ~$2,500
engine
156 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
16 reports
severe · ~$3,100
suspension
5 reports
moderate · ~$900
115 reports
moderate · ~$900
cruise control
8 reports
severe · ~$600
83 reports
critical · ~$600
body
No reports
79 reports
moderate · ~$1,500
fuel system
78 reports
moderate · ~$1,200
No reports
steering
6 reports
moderate · ~$700
54 reports
severe · ~$700
airbags
18 reports
severe · ~$1,100
37 reports
severe · ~$1,100
brakes
No reports
32 reports
severe · ~$450
electrical
11 reports
severe · ~$850
No reports

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2007 Nissan Pathfinder or the 2007 Toyota Tacoma?

It's close to a tie. Both vehicles score within 0.2 points on our reliability index (3.5 vs 3.4). At this margin, either choice is defensible — base your decision on the specific failure modes that matter to you.

What goes wrong more often on the 2007 Nissan Pathfinder?

Compared to the 2007 Toyota Tacoma, the 2007 Nissan Pathfinder sees more reported issues in powertrain and engine. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2007 Toyota Tacoma?

Compared to the 2007 Nissan Pathfinder, the 2007 Toyota Tacoma has more complaints in suspension and cruise control. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2007 Toyota Tacoma has more active recalls (1 vs 0). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $13,650 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary auto-generated from the data and reviewed by ASE-certified contributors. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →