Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Cross-comparison · Comparison spans different vehicle types

2008 Mitsubishi Outlander vs 2008 Subaru Forester

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-05-03 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
The 2008 Subaru Forester edges this one on reliability data

Reliability data favors the 2008 Subaru Forester (4.0 versus 3.8). These vehicles aren't a typical head-to-head comparison, but if you're cross-shopping them, the data is what it is.

2008 Mitsubishi Outlander

3.8/5
Reliability score
57 complaints
2 recalls (0 critical)
$10,050 repair exposure
vs
More reliable

2008 Subaru Forester

4.0/5
Reliability score
50 complaints
1 recalls (0 critical)
$8,450 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

The 2008 Subaru Forester edges this comparison on reliability data (4.0 versus 3.8). These aren't a typical head-to-head, but if you're cross-shopping them, the data is what it is.

If you lean 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander, know what you're getting into on powertrain and visibility. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2008 Subaru Forester sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2008 Subaru Forester? Watch the suspension and electrical. The 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 1.2x higher on the 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: pick based on use case more than the spec sheet. If you tow heavy and don't want to think about it, that's one calculation. If you're a daily driver and want the cheapest path forward, that's another. Both of these will get you down the road. We're just telling you where each one is most likely to break.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2008 Mitsubishi Outlander
2008 Subaru Forester
suspension
9 reports
moderate · ~$900
11 reports
moderate · ~$900
engine
7 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
8 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
electrical
4 reports
severe · ~$850
5 reports
severe · ~$850
powertrain
8 reports
severe · ~$2,500
No reports
visibility
7 reports
moderate · ~$350
No reports
cruise control
3 reports
moderate · ~$600
4 reports
severe · ~$600
lighting
5 reports
moderate · ~$250
No reports
steering
No reports
4 reports
moderate · ~$700
body
3 reports
moderate · ~$1,500
No reports
airbags
No reports
3 reports
severe · ~$1,100

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander or the 2008 Subaru Forester?

Based on the NHTSA data we track, the 2008 Subaru Forester comes out ahead with a reliability score of 4.0 versus 3.8. The margin is narrow, so the verdict could shift if you weight specific categories differently or factor in your own use case.

What goes wrong more often on the 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander?

Compared to the 2008 Subaru Forester, the 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander sees more reported issues in powertrain and visibility. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2008 Subaru Forester?

Compared to the 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander, the 2008 Subaru Forester has more complaints in suspension and electrical. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander has more active recalls (2 vs 1). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $10,050 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →