Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Different vehicle classes · Different segments — choice depends on use case

2009 Audi Q5 vs 2009 Ford Expedition

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-05-03 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2009 Audi Q5 versus 2009 Ford Expedition — different vehicles, different jobs

These two come from different segments, which makes a direct reliability comparison less meaningful than usual. Showing the data so you can see what each one is good at and where each one breaks down. The reliability scores (4.1 versus 4.1) reflect different testing populations and use patterns — don't treat them as apples-to-apples.

2009 Audi Q5

4.1/5
Reliability score
30 complaints
1 recalls (0 critical)
$1,100 repair exposure
vs

2009 Ford Expedition

4.1/5
Reliability score
28 complaints
1 recalls (0 critical)
$5,650 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

These come from different vehicle segments, which means we're not declaring a winner here. The 2009 Audi Q5 scores 4.1; the 2009 Ford Expedition scores 4.1. Different testing populations, different driving patterns, different categories of failure. Use the data below to understand what each one is good at and what each one breaks.

If you lean 2009 Audi Q5, know what you're getting into on airbags. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2009 Ford Expedition sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2009 Ford Expedition? Watch the body and electrical. The 2009 Audi Q5 has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 5.1x higher on the 2009 Ford Expedition. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: these are different categories of vehicle. Pick based on what you actually need it for. We're showing the reliability data so you can factor in long-term ownership cost, not pick a winner.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2009 Audi Q5
2009 Ford Expedition
airbags
16 reports
severe · ~$1,100
No reports
body
No reports
4 reports
critical · ~$1,500
electrical
No reports
4 reports
moderate · ~$850
powertrain
No reports
4 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
visibility
No reports
4 reports
moderate · ~$350
brakes
No reports
3 reports
moderate · ~$450

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2009 Audi Q5 or the 2009 Ford Expedition?

It's close to a tie. Both vehicles score within 0.2 points on our reliability index (4.1 vs 4.1). At this margin, either choice is defensible — base your decision on the specific failure modes that matter to you.

What goes wrong more often on the 2009 Audi Q5?

Compared to the 2009 Ford Expedition, the 2009 Audi Q5 sees more reported issues in airbags. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2009 Ford Expedition?

Compared to the 2009 Audi Q5, the 2009 Ford Expedition has more complaints in body and electrical. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

Both vehicles have 1 active recalls. Total recall count alone isn't a great signal — what matters is severity. See the recall counts by severity in the comparison table.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $5,650 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary auto-generated from the data and reviewed by ASE-certified contributors. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →