2009 BMW K 1300 GT vs 2009 Mazda RX-8
Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.
2009 BMW K 1300 GT
2009 Mazda RX-8
Stories from the shop
These come from different vehicle segments, which means we're not declaring a winner here. The 2009 BMW K 1300 GT scores 4.5; the 2009 Mazda RX-8 scores 4.5. Different testing populations, different driving patterns, different categories of failure. Use the data below to understand what each one is good at and what each one breaks.
If you lean 2009 BMW K 1300 GT, know what you're getting into on engine. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2009 Mazda RX-8 sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.
Going with the 2009 Mazda RX-8? Watch the powertrain. The 2009 BMW K 1300 GT has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.
On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 1.2x higher on the 2009 BMW K 1300 GT. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.
Bottom line: these are different categories of vehicle. Pick based on what you actually need it for. We're showing the reliability data so you can factor in long-term ownership cost, not pick a winner.
Side-by-side by problem area
Common questions
Which is more reliable, the 2009 BMW K 1300 GT or the 2009 Mazda RX-8?
It's close to a tie. Both vehicles score within 0.2 points on our reliability index (4.5 vs 4.5). At this margin, either choice is defensible — base your decision on the specific failure modes that matter to you.
What goes wrong more often on the 2009 BMW K 1300 GT?
Compared to the 2009 Mazda RX-8, the 2009 BMW K 1300 GT sees more reported issues in engine. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.
What goes wrong more often on the 2009 Mazda RX-8?
Compared to the 2009 BMW K 1300 GT, the 2009 Mazda RX-8 has more complaints in powertrain. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.
Which has more recalls?
Both vehicles have 0 active recalls. Total recall count alone isn't a great signal — what matters is severity. See the recall counts by severity in the comparison table.
Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?
Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $3,100 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.