Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

2011 mazda CX-7 vs 2011 nissan Murano

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-04-29 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
The 2011 Nissan Murano edges ahead — narrowly

2011 mazda CX-7

3.5/5
Reliability score
151 complaints
1 recalls (1 critical)
$10,800 repair exposure
vs
More reliable

2011 nissan Murano

3.8/5
Reliability score
147 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$8,250 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

The 2011 nissan Murano edges this one, but it's tight. We're talking 3.8 versus 3.5 on the reliability index. Close enough that the right answer for you might be the other truck — depends what you're using it for and what you can afford to fix when something does go.

If you're leaning 2011 mazda CX-7, know what you're getting into on suspension and airbags. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than what the 2011 nissan Murano sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2011 nissan Murano? Watch the powertrain and brakes. The 2011 mazda CX-7 has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 1.3x higher on the 2011 mazda CX-7. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: pick based on use case more than the spec sheet. If you tow heavy and don't want to think about it, that's one calculation. If you're a daily driver and want the cheapest path forward, that's another. Both of these will get you down the road. We're just telling you where each one is most likely to break.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2011 mazda CX-7
2011 nissan Murano
suspension
44 reports
moderate · ~$900
10 reports
moderate · ~$900
powertrain
7 reports
severe · ~$2,500
37 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
brakes
3 reports
moderate · ~$450
37 reports
moderate · ~$450
airbags
25 reports
severe · ~$1,100
10 reports
critical · ~$1,100
lighting
33 reports
moderate · ~$250
No reports
steering
16 reports
severe · ~$700
No reports
electrical
5 reports
moderate · ~$850
8 reports
severe · ~$850
visibility
No reports
10 reports
moderate · ~$350
cruise control
3 reports
moderate · ~$600
3 reports
moderate · ~$600
body
No reports
6 reports
moderate · ~$1,500

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2011 Mazda CX-7 or the 2011 Nissan Murano?

Based on the NHTSA data we track, the 2011 Nissan Murano comes out ahead with a reliability score of 3.8 versus 3.5. The margin is narrow, so the verdict could shift if you weight specific categories differently or factor in your own use case.

What goes wrong more often on the 2011 Mazda CX-7?

Compared to the 2011 Nissan Murano, the 2011 Mazda CX-7 sees more reported issues in suspension and airbags. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2011 Nissan Murano?

Compared to the 2011 Mazda CX-7, the 2011 Nissan Murano has more complaints in powertrain and brakes. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2011 Mazda CX-7 has more active recalls (1 vs 0). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $10,800 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary auto-generated from the data and reviewed by ASE-certified contributors. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →