Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

2012 chevrolet Malibu vs 2012 ford Explorer

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-04-29 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2012 Chevrolet Malibu and 2012 Ford Explorer are nearly tied on reliability data

2012 chevrolet Malibu

3.1/5
Reliability score
904 complaints
3 recalls (0 critical)
$14,400 repair exposure
vs

2012 ford Explorer

3.3/5
Reliability score
814 complaints
1 recalls (0 critical)
$14,150 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

Look, these two are running close enough that you'd be fine either way. Reliability scores are within rounding distance (3.1 for the 2012 chevrolet Malibu, 3.3 for the 2012 ford Explorer), and they've each got their own laundry list of weak spots. There's no clean winner here on the data alone.

If you're leaning 2012 chevrolet Malibu, know what you're getting into on electrical and lighting. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than what the 2012 ford Explorer sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2012 ford Explorer? Watch the steering and body. The 2012 chevrolet Malibu has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

Bottom line: pick based on use case more than the spec sheet. If you tow heavy and don't want to think about it, that's one calculation. If you're a daily driver and want the cheapest path forward, that's another. Both of these will get you down the road. We're just telling you where each one is most likely to break.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2012 chevrolet Malibu
2012 ford Explorer
steering
190 reports
severe · ~$700
354 reports
moderate · ~$700
electrical
236 reports
severe · ~$850
34 reports
severe · ~$850
body
No reports
124 reports
moderate · ~$1,500
lighting
115 reports
moderate · ~$250
No reports
airbags
73 reports
severe · ~$1,100
21 reports
moderate · ~$1,100
engine
30 reports
severe · ~$3,100
59 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
powertrain
44 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
42 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
seatbelts
32 reports
severe · ~$500
No reports
brakes
24 reports
severe · ~$450
No reports
visibility
No reports
19 reports
moderate · ~$350

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2012 Chevrolet Malibu or the 2012 Ford Explorer?

It's close to a tie. Both vehicles score within 0.2 points on our reliability index (3.1 vs 3.3). At this margin, either choice is defensible — base your decision on the specific failure modes that matter to you.

What goes wrong more often on the 2012 Chevrolet Malibu?

Compared to the 2012 Ford Explorer, the 2012 Chevrolet Malibu sees more reported issues in electrical and lighting. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2012 Ford Explorer?

Compared to the 2012 Chevrolet Malibu, the 2012 Ford Explorer has more complaints in steering and body. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2012 Chevrolet Malibu has more active recalls (3 vs 1). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $14,400 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary auto-generated from the data and reviewed by ASE-certified contributors. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →