Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

2013 cadillac XTS vs 2013 nissan Juke

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-04-29 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2013 Cadillac XTS and 2013 Nissan Juke are nearly tied on reliability data

2013 cadillac XTS

3.8/5
Reliability score
102 complaints
1 recalls (0 critical)
$6,800 repair exposure
vs

2013 nissan Juke

3.9/5
Reliability score
99 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$10,800 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

Look, these two are running close enough that you'd be fine either way. Reliability scores are within rounding distance (3.8 for the 2013 cadillac XTS, 3.9 for the 2013 nissan Juke), and they've each got their own laundry list of weak spots. There's no clean winner here on the data alone.

If you're leaning 2013 cadillac XTS, know what you're getting into on electrical and suspension. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than what the 2013 nissan Juke sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2013 nissan Juke? Watch the engine and powertrain. The 2013 cadillac XTS has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 1.6x higher on the 2013 nissan Juke. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: pick based on use case more than the spec sheet. If you tow heavy and don't want to think about it, that's one calculation. If you're a daily driver and want the cheapest path forward, that's another. Both of these will get you down the road. We're just telling you where each one is most likely to break.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2013 cadillac XTS
2013 nissan Juke
electrical
37 reports
severe · ~$850
13 reports
severe · ~$850
engine
3 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
27 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
suspension
24 reports
moderate · ~$900
No reports
powertrain
No reports
16 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
steering
3 reports
moderate · ~$700
4 reports
moderate · ~$700
cruise control
No reports
6 reports
moderate · ~$600
lighting
5 reports
moderate · ~$250
No reports
wheels
5 reports
moderate · ~$400
No reports
fuel system
No reports
5 reports
severe · ~$1,200
visibility
No reports
5 reports
moderate · ~$350

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2013 Cadillac XTS or the 2013 Nissan Juke?

It's close to a tie. Both vehicles score within 0.2 points on our reliability index (3.8 vs 3.9). At this margin, either choice is defensible — base your decision on the specific failure modes that matter to you.

What goes wrong more often on the 2013 Cadillac XTS?

Compared to the 2013 Nissan Juke, the 2013 Cadillac XTS sees more reported issues in electrical and suspension. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2013 Nissan Juke?

Compared to the 2013 Cadillac XTS, the 2013 Nissan Juke has more complaints in engine and powertrain. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2013 Cadillac XTS has more active recalls (1 vs 0). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $10,800 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary auto-generated from the data and reviewed by ASE-certified contributors. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →