Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

2014 ford Edge vs 2014 mazda CX-5

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-04-29 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2014 Ford Edge and 2014 Mazda CX-5 are nearly tied on reliability data

2014 ford Edge

3.6/5
Reliability score
375 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$13,900 repair exposure
vs

2014 mazda CX-5

3.6/5
Reliability score
377 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$12,300 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

Look, these two are running close enough that you'd be fine either way. Reliability scores are within rounding distance (3.6 for the 2014 ford Edge, 3.6 for the 2014 mazda CX-5), and they've each got their own laundry list of weak spots. There's no clean winner here on the data alone.

If you're leaning 2014 ford Edge, know what you're getting into on brakes and engine. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than what the 2014 mazda CX-5 sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2014 mazda CX-5? Watch the electrical and visibility. The 2014 ford Edge has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

Bottom line: pick based on use case more than the spec sheet. If you tow heavy and don't want to think about it, that's one calculation. If you're a daily driver and want the cheapest path forward, that's another. Both of these will get you down the road. We're just telling you where each one is most likely to break.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2014 ford Edge
2014 mazda CX-5
electrical
52 reports
severe · ~$850
114 reports
moderate · ~$850
powertrain
48 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
49 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
visibility
13 reports
moderate · ~$350
71 reports
moderate · ~$350
brakes
59 reports
moderate · ~$450
20 reports
severe · ~$450
engine
26 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
12 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
body
10 reports
moderate · ~$1,500
28 reports
moderate · ~$1,500
steering
15 reports
severe · ~$700
7 reports
moderate · ~$700
airbags
9 reports
severe · ~$1,100
8 reports
severe · ~$1,100

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2014 Ford Edge or the 2014 Mazda CX-5?

It's close to a tie. Both vehicles score within 0.2 points on our reliability index (3.6 vs 3.6). At this margin, either choice is defensible — base your decision on the specific failure modes that matter to you.

What goes wrong more often on the 2014 Ford Edge?

Compared to the 2014 Mazda CX-5, the 2014 Ford Edge sees more reported issues in brakes and engine. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2014 Mazda CX-5?

Compared to the 2014 Ford Edge, the 2014 Mazda CX-5 has more complaints in electrical and visibility. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

Both vehicles have 0 active recalls. Total recall count alone isn't a great signal — what matters is severity. See the recall counts by severity in the comparison table.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $13,900 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary auto-generated from the data and reviewed by ASE-certified contributors. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →