Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

2016 acura RDX vs 2016 nissan Leaf

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-04-29 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
The 2016 Nissan Leaf edges ahead clearly on reliability data

2016 acura RDX

3.5/5
Reliability score
38 complaints
2 recalls (2 critical)
$6,000 repair exposure
vs
More reliable

2016 nissan Leaf

4.0/5
Reliability score
35 complaints
1 recalls (0 critical)
$1,300 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

If you're putting a gun to my head, I'd take the 2016 nissan Leaf. Reliability score's a solid 4.0 versus 3.5 on the 2016 acura RDX, and the complaint counts back it up — 35 versus 38. That's not noise, that's a real gap.

If you're leaning 2016 acura RDX, know what you're getting into on powertrain and body. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than what the 2016 nissan Leaf sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2016 nissan Leaf? Watch the electrical and brakes. The 2016 acura RDX has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 4.6x higher on the 2016 acura RDX. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: pick based on use case more than the spec sheet. If you tow heavy and don't want to think about it, that's one calculation. If you're a daily driver and want the cheapest path forward, that's another. Both of these will get you down the road. We're just telling you where each one is most likely to break.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2016 acura RDX
2016 nissan Leaf
electrical
7 reports
severe · ~$850
11 reports
severe · ~$850
brakes
4 reports
moderate · ~$450
14 reports
severe · ~$450
powertrain
6 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
No reports
body
3 reports
moderate · ~$1,500
No reports
steering
3 reports
moderate · ~$700
No reports

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2016 Acura RDX or the 2016 Nissan Leaf?

Based on the NHTSA data we track, the 2016 Nissan Leaf comes out ahead with a reliability score of 4.0 versus 3.5. The margin is clear, so the verdict could shift if you weight specific categories differently or factor in your own use case.

What goes wrong more often on the 2016 Acura RDX?

Compared to the 2016 Nissan Leaf, the 2016 Acura RDX sees more reported issues in powertrain and body. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2016 Nissan Leaf?

Compared to the 2016 Acura RDX, the 2016 Nissan Leaf has more complaints in electrical and brakes. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2016 Acura RDX has more active recalls (2 vs 1). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $6,000 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary auto-generated from the data and reviewed by ASE-certified contributors. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →