2017 acura RDX vs 2017 nissan Rogue Sport
Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.
2017 acura RDX
2017 nissan Rogue Sport
Stories from the shop
Look, these two are running close enough that you'd be fine either way. Reliability scores are within rounding distance (4.0 for the 2017 acura RDX, 4.0 for the 2017 nissan Rogue Sport), and they've each got their own laundry list of weak spots. There's no clean winner here on the data alone.
If you're leaning 2017 acura RDX, know what you're getting into on electrical and brakes. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than what the 2017 nissan Rogue Sport sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.
Going with the 2017 nissan Rogue Sport? Watch the powertrain and engine. The 2017 acura RDX has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.
Bottom line: pick based on use case more than the spec sheet. If you tow heavy and don't want to think about it, that's one calculation. If you're a daily driver and want the cheapest path forward, that's another. Both of these will get you down the road. We're just telling you where each one is most likely to break.
Side-by-side by problem area
Common questions
Which is more reliable, the 2017 Acura RDX or the 2017 Nissan Rogue Sport?
It's close to a tie. Both vehicles score within 0.2 points on our reliability index (4.0 vs 4.0). At this margin, either choice is defensible — base your decision on the specific failure modes that matter to you.
What goes wrong more often on the 2017 Acura RDX?
Compared to the 2017 Nissan Rogue Sport, the 2017 Acura RDX sees more reported issues in electrical and brakes. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.
What goes wrong more often on the 2017 Nissan Rogue Sport?
Compared to the 2017 Acura RDX, the 2017 Nissan Rogue Sport has more complaints in powertrain and engine. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.
Which has more recalls?
Both vehicles have 0 active recalls. Total recall count alone isn't a great signal — what matters is severity. See the recall counts by severity in the comparison table.
Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?
Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $8,600 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.