Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

2017 ford Mustang vs 2017 toyota Highlander

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-04-29 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
The 2017 Toyota Highlander edges ahead clearly on reliability data

2017 ford Mustang

3.0/5
Reliability score
250 complaints
5 recalls (1 critical)
$11,700 repair exposure
vs
More reliable

2017 toyota Highlander

3.6/5
Reliability score
252 complaints
1 recalls (0 critical)
$14,400 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

If you're putting a gun to my head, I'd take the 2017 toyota Highlander. Reliability score's a solid 3.6 versus 3.0 on the 2017 ford Mustang, and the complaint counts back it up — 252 versus 250. That's not noise, that's a real gap.

If you're leaning 2017 ford Mustang, know what you're getting into on engine and body. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than what the 2017 toyota Highlander sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2017 toyota Highlander? Watch the powertrain and electrical. The 2017 ford Mustang has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 1.2x higher on the 2017 toyota Highlander. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: pick based on use case more than the spec sheet. If you tow heavy and don't want to think about it, that's one calculation. If you're a daily driver and want the cheapest path forward, that's another. Both of these will get you down the road. We're just telling you where each one is most likely to break.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2017 ford Mustang
2017 toyota Highlander
powertrain
20 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
64 reports
severe · ~$2,500
electrical
28 reports
severe · ~$850
42 reports
severe · ~$850
engine
25 reports
severe · ~$3,100
21 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
body
33 reports
severe · ~$1,500
6 reports
severe · ~$1,500
airbags
10 reports
severe · ~$1,100
9 reports
severe · ~$1,100
visibility
No reports
15 reports
severe · ~$350
brakes
3 reports
moderate · ~$450
11 reports
moderate · ~$450
seatbelts
12 reports
moderate · ~$500
No reports
steering
11 reports
moderate · ~$700
No reports
fuel system
No reports
8 reports
moderate · ~$1,200

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2017 Ford Mustang or the 2017 Toyota Highlander?

Based on the NHTSA data we track, the 2017 Toyota Highlander comes out ahead with a reliability score of 3.6 versus 3.0. The margin is clear, so the verdict could shift if you weight specific categories differently or factor in your own use case.

What goes wrong more often on the 2017 Ford Mustang?

Compared to the 2017 Toyota Highlander, the 2017 Ford Mustang sees more reported issues in engine and body. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2017 Toyota Highlander?

Compared to the 2017 Ford Mustang, the 2017 Toyota Highlander has more complaints in powertrain and electrical. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2017 Ford Mustang has more active recalls (5 vs 1). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $14,400 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary auto-generated from the data and reviewed by ASE-certified contributors. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →