Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Different vehicle classes · Different segments — choice depends on use case

2017 Nissan Rogue vs 2017 Subaru Forester

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-05-03 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2017 Nissan Rogue versus 2017 Subaru Forester — different vehicles, different jobs

These two come from different segments, which makes a direct reliability comparison less meaningful than usual. Showing the data so you can see what each one is good at and where each one breaks down. The reliability scores (3.2 versus 3.5) reflect different testing populations and use patterns — don't treat them as apples-to-apples.

2017 Nissan Rogue

3.2/5
Reliability score
579 complaints
3 recalls (0 critical)
$13,200 repair exposure
vs

2017 Subaru Forester

3.5/5
Reliability score
566 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$12,450 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

These come from different vehicle segments, which means we're not declaring a winner here. The 2017 Nissan Rogue scores 3.2; the 2017 Subaru Forester scores 3.5. Different testing populations, different driving patterns, different categories of failure. Use the data below to understand what each one is good at and what each one breaks.

If you lean 2017 Nissan Rogue, know what you're getting into on powertrain and brakes. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2017 Subaru Forester sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2017 Subaru Forester? Watch the airbags and electrical. The 2017 Nissan Rogue has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

Bottom line: these are different categories of vehicle. Pick based on what you actually need it for. We're showing the reliability data so you can factor in long-term ownership cost, not pick a winner.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2017 Nissan Rogue
2017 Subaru Forester
airbags
62 reports
severe · ~$1,100
139 reports
severe · ~$1,100
powertrain
116 reports
severe · ~$2,500
40 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
electrical
56 reports
severe · ~$850
92 reports
moderate · ~$850
visibility
No reports
105 reports
moderate · ~$350
brakes
70 reports
severe · ~$450
No reports
engine
27 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
23 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
steering
22 reports
severe · ~$700
24 reports
severe · ~$700
cruise control
19 reports
severe · ~$600
19 reports
severe · ~$600
body
19 reports
severe · ~$1,500
12 reports
severe · ~$1,500

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2017 Nissan Rogue or the 2017 Subaru Forester?

Based on the NHTSA data we track, the 2017 Subaru Forester comes out ahead with a reliability score of 3.5 versus 3.2. The margin is narrow, so the verdict could shift if you weight specific categories differently or factor in your own use case.

What goes wrong more often on the 2017 Nissan Rogue?

Compared to the 2017 Subaru Forester, the 2017 Nissan Rogue sees more reported issues in powertrain and brakes. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2017 Subaru Forester?

Compared to the 2017 Nissan Rogue, the 2017 Subaru Forester has more complaints in airbags and electrical. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2017 Nissan Rogue has more active recalls (3 vs 0). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $13,200 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →