Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Direct rivals · Direct rivals in the full size suv segment

2018 Ford Expedition vs 2018 GMC Acadia

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-05-03 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2018 GMC Acadia clearly comes out ahead on reliability data

Two trucks built for the same buyer, and the data tells a clear story. The 2018 GMC Acadia edges the 2018 Ford Expedition on reliability scoring (3.6 versus 3.0) with meaningful gaps in complaint volume and severity. Real differences, not noise.

2018 Ford Expedition

3.0/5
Reliability score
346 complaints
6 recalls (0 critical)
$13,200 repair exposure
vs
More reliable

2018 GMC Acadia

3.6/5
Reliability score
374 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$9,400 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

If I'm picking between these two head-to-head, I'm taking the 2018 GMC Acadia. Reliability score's a solid 3.6 versus 3.0 on the 2018 Ford Expedition, and the complaint counts back it up — 374 versus 346. That's not noise, that's a real gap between rivals built for the same buyer.

If you lean 2018 Ford Expedition, know what you're getting into on engine and suspension. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2018 GMC Acadia sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2018 GMC Acadia? Watch the electrical and steering. The 2018 Ford Expedition has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 1.4x higher on the 2018 Ford Expedition. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: pick based on use case more than the spec sheet. If you tow heavy and don't want to think about it, that's one calculation. If you're a daily driver and want the cheapest path forward, that's another. Both of these will get you down the road. We're just telling you where each one is most likely to break.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2018 Ford Expedition
2018 GMC Acadia
powertrain
128 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
150 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
engine
82 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
7 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
electrical
19 reports
severe · ~$850
67 reports
moderate · ~$850
suspension
24 reports
moderate · ~$900
4 reports
moderate · ~$900
lighting
22 reports
moderate · ~$250
No reports
steering
No reports
20 reports
severe · ~$700
brakes
No reports
12 reports
severe · ~$450
wheels
8 reports
moderate · ~$400
3 reports
moderate · ~$400
visibility
8 reports
moderate · ~$350
No reports
body
7 reports
moderate · ~$1,500
No reports

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2018 Ford Expedition or the 2018 GMC Acadia?

Based on the NHTSA data we track, the 2018 GMC Acadia comes out ahead with a reliability score of 3.6 versus 3.0. The margin is clear, so the verdict could shift if you weight specific categories differently or factor in your own use case.

What goes wrong more often on the 2018 Ford Expedition?

Compared to the 2018 GMC Acadia, the 2018 Ford Expedition sees more reported issues in engine and suspension. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2018 GMC Acadia?

Compared to the 2018 Ford Expedition, the 2018 GMC Acadia has more complaints in electrical and steering. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2018 Ford Expedition has more active recalls (6 vs 0). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $13,200 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →