Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Cross-comparison · Comparison spans different vehicle types

2012 Hyundai Veloster vs 2012 Nissan Rogue

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-05-03 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
The 2012 Nissan Rogue edges this one on reliability data

Reliability data favors the 2012 Nissan Rogue (3.5 versus 3.2). These vehicles aren't a typical head-to-head comparison, but if you're cross-shopping them, the data is what it is.

2012 Hyundai Veloster

3.2/5
Reliability score
294 complaints
4 recalls (0 critical)
$12,200 repair exposure
vs
More reliable

2012 Nissan Rogue

3.5/5
Reliability score
317 complaints
1 recalls (0 critical)
$9,800 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

The 2012 Nissan Rogue edges this comparison on reliability data (3.5 versus 3.2). These aren't a typical head-to-head, but if you're cross-shopping them, the data is what it is.

If you lean 2012 Hyundai Veloster, know what you're getting into on visibility and engine. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2012 Nissan Rogue sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2012 Nissan Rogue? Watch the powertrain and airbags. The 2012 Hyundai Veloster has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 1.2x higher on the 2012 Hyundai Veloster. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: pick based on use case more than the spec sheet. If you tow heavy and don't want to think about it, that's one calculation. If you're a daily driver and want the cheapest path forward, that's another. Both of these will get you down the road. We're just telling you where each one is most likely to break.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2012 Hyundai Veloster
2012 Nissan Rogue
powertrain
28 reports
severe · ~$2,500
134 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
electrical
32 reports
severe · ~$850
36 reports
severe · ~$850
visibility
64 reports
severe · ~$350
No reports
engine
31 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
19 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
steering
42 reports
moderate · ~$700
3 reports
moderate · ~$700
airbags
11 reports
severe · ~$1,100
34 reports
severe · ~$1,100
brakes
18 reports
severe · ~$450
7 reports
moderate · ~$450
cruise control
No reports
21 reports
moderate · ~$600
body
11 reports
severe · ~$1,500
No reports
tires
No reports
5 reports
moderate · ~$150

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2012 Hyundai Veloster or the 2012 Nissan Rogue?

Based on the NHTSA data we track, the 2012 Nissan Rogue comes out ahead with a reliability score of 3.5 versus 3.2. The margin is narrow, so the verdict could shift if you weight specific categories differently or factor in your own use case.

What goes wrong more often on the 2012 Hyundai Veloster?

Compared to the 2012 Nissan Rogue, the 2012 Hyundai Veloster sees more reported issues in visibility and engine. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2012 Nissan Rogue?

Compared to the 2012 Hyundai Veloster, the 2012 Nissan Rogue has more complaints in powertrain and airbags. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2012 Hyundai Veloster has more active recalls (4 vs 1). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $12,200 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →