Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Direct rivals · Direct rivals in the minivan segment

2017 Kia Sedona vs 2017 Toyota Sienna

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-05-03 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2017 Kia Sedona and 2017 Toyota Sienna are nearly tied on reliability data

Two direct rivals running close on the data. Reliability scores are within rounding distance (3.7 versus 3.8), and both have similar complaint patterns. At this margin, choose based on what specifically matters to your use case rather than overall scoring.

2017 Kia Sedona

3.7/5
Reliability score
129 complaints
1 recalls (0 critical)
$10,000 repair exposure
vs

2017 Toyota Sienna

3.8/5
Reliability score
143 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$13,500 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

Direct rivals running close enough that you'd be fine either way. Reliability scores within rounding distance (3.7 for the 2017 Kia Sedona, 3.8 for the 2017 Toyota Sienna). When two vehicles in the same segment land this close, the data alone won't pick a winner.

If you lean 2017 Kia Sedona, know what you're getting into on engine and electrical. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2017 Toyota Sienna sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2017 Toyota Sienna? Watch the powertrain and wheels. The 2017 Kia Sedona has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 1.4x higher on the 2017 Toyota Sienna. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: pick based on use case more than the spec sheet. If you tow heavy and don't want to think about it, that's one calculation. If you're a daily driver and want the cheapest path forward, that's another. Both of these will get you down the road. We're just telling you where each one is most likely to break.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2017 Kia Sedona
2017 Toyota Sienna
engine
49 reports
severe · ~$3,100
7 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
electrical
21 reports
moderate · ~$850
16 reports
severe · ~$850
powertrain
4 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
27 reports
severe · ~$2,500
body
9 reports
severe · ~$1,500
10 reports
severe · ~$1,500
wheels
No reports
13 reports
moderate · ~$400
airbags
10 reports
severe · ~$1,100
No reports
steering
3 reports
severe · ~$700
7 reports
severe · ~$700
lighting
6 reports
moderate · ~$250
No reports
brakes
No reports
6 reports
severe · ~$450
visibility
No reports
6 reports
moderate · ~$350

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2017 Kia Sedona or the 2017 Toyota Sienna?

It's close to a tie. Both vehicles score within 0.2 points on our reliability index (3.7 vs 3.8). At this margin, either choice is defensible — base your decision on the specific failure modes that matter to you.

What goes wrong more often on the 2017 Kia Sedona?

Compared to the 2017 Toyota Sienna, the 2017 Kia Sedona sees more reported issues in engine and electrical. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2017 Toyota Sienna?

Compared to the 2017 Kia Sedona, the 2017 Toyota Sienna has more complaints in powertrain and wheels. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2017 Kia Sedona has more active recalls (1 vs 0). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $13,500 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →