Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Direct rivals · Direct rivals in the midsize truck segment

2007 Chevrolet Silverado vs 2007 Ford Ranger

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-06-14 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2007 Ford Ranger clearly comes out ahead on reliability data

Two trucks built for the same buyer, and the data tells a clear story. The 2007 Ford Ranger edges the 2007 Chevrolet Silverado on reliability scoring (3.7 versus 3.2) with meaningful gaps in complaint volume and severity. Real differences, not noise.

2007 Chevrolet Silverado

3.2/5
Reliability score
1,055 complaints
1 recalls (0 critical)
$14,550 repair exposure
vs
More reliable

2007 Ford Ranger

3.7/5
Reliability score
267 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$7,600 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

If I'm picking between these two head-to-head, I'm taking the 2007 Ford Ranger. Reliability score's a solid 3.7 versus 3.2 on the 2007 Chevrolet Silverado, and the complaint counts back it up — 267 versus 1,055. That's not noise, that's a real gap between rivals built for the same buyer.

If you lean 2007 Chevrolet Silverado, know what you're getting into on airbags and electrical. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2007 Ford Ranger sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2007 Ford Ranger? Watch the suspension and tires. The 2007 Chevrolet Silverado has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 1.9x higher on the 2007 Chevrolet Silverado. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: pick based on use case more than the spec sheet. If you tow heavy and don't want to think about it, that's one calculation. If you're a daily driver and want the cheapest path forward, that's another. Both of these will get you down the road. We're just telling you where each one is most likely to break.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2007 Chevrolet Silverado
2007 Ford Ranger
airbags
503 reports
critical · ~$1,100
231 reports
severe · ~$1,100
electrical
107 reports
critical · ~$850
4 reports
severe · ~$850
brakes
88 reports
moderate · ~$450
No reports
engine
59 reports
severe · ~$3,100
3 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
body
51 reports
critical · ~$1,500
10 reports
moderate · ~$1,500
powertrain
45 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
No reports
steering
32 reports
severe · ~$700
No reports
seatbelts
19 reports
severe · ~$500
No reports
suspension
No reports
4 reports
severe · ~$900
tires
No reports
4 reports
moderate · ~$150

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2007 Chevrolet Silverado or the 2007 Ford Ranger?

Based on the NHTSA data we track, the 2007 Ford Ranger comes out ahead with a reliability score of 3.7 versus 3.2. The margin is clear, so the verdict could shift if you weight specific categories differently or factor in your own use case.

What goes wrong more often on the 2007 Chevrolet Silverado?

Compared to the 2007 Ford Ranger, the 2007 Chevrolet Silverado sees more reported issues in airbags and electrical. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2007 Ford Ranger?

Compared to the 2007 Chevrolet Silverado, the 2007 Ford Ranger has more complaints in suspension and tires. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2007 Chevrolet Silverado has more active recalls (1 vs 0). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $14,550 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. Verify each vehicle's federal record: 2007 Chevrolet Silverado on NHTSA · 2007 Ford Ranger on NHTSA. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →
Sponsored — we earn a commission if you complete a quote. Disclosure.