Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Cross-comparison · Comparison spans different vehicle types

2008 Chevrolet Cobalt vs 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-06-14 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
The 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer edges this one on reliability data

Reliability data favors the 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer (3.9 versus 3.4). These vehicles aren't a typical head-to-head comparison, but if you're cross-shopping them, the data is what it is.

2008 Chevrolet Cobalt

3.4/5
Reliability score
938 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$14,150 repair exposure
vs
More reliable

2008 Mitsubishi Lancer

3.9/5
Reliability score
91 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$11,100 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

The 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer edges this comparison on reliability data (3.9 versus 3.4). These aren't a typical head-to-head, but if you're cross-shopping them, the data is what it is.

If you lean 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt, know what you're getting into on steering and electrical. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer? Watch the suspension and body. The 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 1.3x higher on the 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: pick based on use case more than the spec sheet. If you tow heavy and don't want to think about it, that's one calculation. If you're a daily driver and want the cheapest path forward, that's another. Both of these will get you down the road. We're just telling you where each one is most likely to break.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2008 Chevrolet Cobalt
2008 Mitsubishi Lancer
steering
310 reports
critical · ~$700
12 reports
moderate · ~$700
electrical
123 reports
critical · ~$850
5 reports
severe · ~$850
brakes
85 reports
moderate · ~$450
6 reports
severe · ~$450
airbags
53 reports
critical · ~$1,100
7 reports
severe · ~$1,100
engine
29 reports
severe · ~$3,100
15 reports
severe · ~$3,100
fuel system
43 reports
moderate · ~$1,200
No reports
powertrain
18 reports
severe · ~$2,500
10 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
suspension
No reports
16 reports
severe · ~$900
lighting
14 reports
severe · ~$250
No reports
body
No reports
6 reports
moderate · ~$1,500

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt or the 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer?

Based on the NHTSA data we track, the 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer comes out ahead with a reliability score of 3.9 versus 3.4. The margin is clear, so the verdict could shift if you weight specific categories differently or factor in your own use case.

What goes wrong more often on the 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt?

Compared to the 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer, the 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt sees more reported issues in steering and electrical. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer?

Compared to the 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt, the 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer has more complaints in suspension and body. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

Both vehicles have 0 active recalls. Total recall count alone isn't a great signal — what matters is severity. See the recall counts by severity in the comparison table.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $14,150 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. Verify each vehicle's federal record: 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt on NHTSA · 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer on NHTSA. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →
Sponsored — we earn a commission if you complete a quote. Disclosure.