Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Direct rivals · Direct rivals in the full size suv segment

2012 Ford Expedition vs 2012 Toyota Sequoia

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-06-14 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2012 Toyota Sequoia clearly comes out ahead on reliability data

Two trucks built for the same buyer, and the data tells a clear story. The 2012 Toyota Sequoia edges the 2012 Ford Expedition on reliability scoring (4.3 versus 3.8) with meaningful gaps in complaint volume and severity. Real differences, not noise.

2012 Ford Expedition

3.8/5
Reliability score
116 complaints
1 recalls (0 critical)
$9,450 repair exposure
vs
More reliable

2012 Toyota Sequoia

4.3/5
Reliability score
20 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$2,800 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

If I'm picking between these two head-to-head, I'm taking the 2012 Toyota Sequoia. Reliability score's a solid 4.3 versus 3.8 on the 2012 Ford Expedition, and the complaint counts back it up — 20 versus 116. That's not noise, that's a real gap between rivals built for the same buyer.

If you lean 2012 Ford Expedition, know what you're getting into on powertrain and body. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2012 Toyota Sequoia sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2012 Toyota Sequoia? Watch the brakes. The 2012 Ford Expedition has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 3.4x higher on the 2012 Ford Expedition. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: pick based on use case more than the spec sheet. If you tow heavy and don't want to think about it, that's one calculation. If you're a daily driver and want the cheapest path forward, that's another. Both of these will get you down the road. We're just telling you where each one is most likely to break.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2012 Ford Expedition
2012 Toyota Sequoia
powertrain
64 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
No reports
body
12 reports
severe · ~$1,500
3 reports
moderate · ~$1,500
electrical
10 reports
severe · ~$850
5 reports
moderate · ~$850
engine
5 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
No reports
cruise control
3 reports
moderate · ~$600
No reports
suspension
3 reports
moderate · ~$900
No reports
brakes
No reports
3 reports
moderate · ~$450

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2012 Ford Expedition or the 2012 Toyota Sequoia?

Based on the NHTSA data we track, the 2012 Toyota Sequoia comes out ahead with a reliability score of 4.3 versus 3.8. The margin is clear, so the verdict could shift if you weight specific categories differently or factor in your own use case.

What goes wrong more often on the 2012 Ford Expedition?

Compared to the 2012 Toyota Sequoia, the 2012 Ford Expedition sees more reported issues in powertrain and body. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2012 Toyota Sequoia?

Compared to the 2012 Ford Expedition, the 2012 Toyota Sequoia has more complaints in brakes. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2012 Ford Expedition has more active recalls (1 vs 0). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $9,450 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. Verify each vehicle's federal record: 2012 Ford Expedition on NHTSA · 2012 Toyota Sequoia on NHTSA. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →
Sponsored — we earn a commission if you complete a quote. Disclosure.