Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Direct rivals · Direct rivals in the full size suv segment

2013 Ford Explorer vs 2013 GMC Acadia

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-06-14 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2013 GMC Acadia clearly comes out ahead on reliability data

Two trucks built for the same buyer, and the data tells a clear story. The 2013 GMC Acadia edges the 2013 Ford Explorer on reliability scoring (3.8 versus 2.8) with meaningful gaps in complaint volume and severity. Real differences, not noise.

2013 Ford Explorer

2.8/5
Reliability score
2,216 complaints
4 recalls (0 critical)
$14,400 repair exposure
vs
More reliable

2013 GMC Acadia

3.8/5
Reliability score
137 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$10,600 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

If I'm picking between these two head-to-head, I'm taking the 2013 GMC Acadia. Reliability score's a solid 3.8 versus 2.8 on the 2013 Ford Explorer, and the complaint counts back it up — 137 versus 2,216. That's not noise, that's a real gap between rivals built for the same buyer.

If you lean 2013 Ford Explorer, know what you're getting into on steering and body. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2013 GMC Acadia sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2013 GMC Acadia? Watch the airbags and lighting. The 2013 Ford Explorer has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 1.4x higher on the 2013 Ford Explorer. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: pick based on use case more than the spec sheet. If you tow heavy and don't want to think about it, that's one calculation. If you're a daily driver and want the cheapest path forward, that's another. Both of these will get you down the road. We're just telling you where each one is most likely to break.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2013 Ford Explorer
2013 GMC Acadia
steering
829 reports
moderate · ~$700
8 reports
moderate · ~$700
body
382 reports
moderate · ~$1,500
4 reports
severe · ~$1,500
engine
191 reports
severe · ~$3,100
7 reports
severe · ~$3,100
electrical
110 reports
moderate · ~$850
34 reports
severe · ~$850
powertrain
95 reports
critical · ~$2,500
26 reports
severe · ~$2,500
suspension
55 reports
severe · ~$900
No reports
visibility
42 reports
moderate · ~$350
No reports
fuel system
30 reports
moderate · ~$1,200
No reports
airbags
No reports
26 reports
severe · ~$1,100
lighting
No reports
8 reports
moderate · ~$250

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2013 Ford Explorer or the 2013 GMC Acadia?

Based on the NHTSA data we track, the 2013 GMC Acadia comes out ahead with a reliability score of 3.8 versus 2.8. The margin is clear, so the verdict could shift if you weight specific categories differently or factor in your own use case.

What goes wrong more often on the 2013 Ford Explorer?

Compared to the 2013 GMC Acadia, the 2013 Ford Explorer sees more reported issues in steering and body. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2013 GMC Acadia?

Compared to the 2013 Ford Explorer, the 2013 GMC Acadia has more complaints in airbags and lighting. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2013 Ford Explorer has more active recalls (4 vs 0). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $14,400 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. Verify each vehicle's federal record: 2013 Ford Explorer on NHTSA · 2013 GMC Acadia on NHTSA. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →
Sponsored — we earn a commission if you complete a quote. Disclosure.