Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Direct rivals · Direct rivals in the luxury suv segment

2017 Acura RDX vs 2017 Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-06-14 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2017 Acura RDX and 2017 Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class are nearly tied on reliability data

Two direct rivals running close on the data. Reliability scores are within rounding distance (4.0 versus 3.9), and both have similar complaint patterns. At this margin, choose based on what specifically matters to your use case rather than overall scoring.

2017 Acura RDX

4.0/5
Reliability score
73 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$8,600 repair exposure
vs

2017 Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class

3.9/5
Reliability score
115 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$11,050 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

Direct rivals running close enough that you'd be fine either way. Reliability scores within rounding distance (4.0 for the 2017 Acura RDX, 3.9 for the 2017 Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class). When two vehicles in the same segment land this close, the data alone won't pick a winner.

If you lean 2017 Acura RDX, know what you're getting into on powertrain and brakes. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2017 Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2017 Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class? Watch the electrical and engine. The 2017 Acura RDX has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 1.3x higher on the 2017 Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: pick based on use case more than the spec sheet. If you tow heavy and don't want to think about it, that's one calculation. If you're a daily driver and want the cheapest path forward, that's another. Both of these will get you down the road. We're just telling you where each one is most likely to break.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2017 Acura RDX
2017 Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class
electrical
13 reports
moderate · ~$850
17 reports
severe · ~$850
powertrain
20 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
8 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
engine
5 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
23 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
brakes
9 reports
severe · ~$450
4 reports
moderate · ~$450
airbags
3 reports
severe · ~$1,100
10 reports
severe · ~$1,100
visibility
No reports
10 reports
moderate · ~$350
seatbelts
No reports
6 reports
moderate · ~$500
cruise control
5 reports
moderate · ~$600
No reports
steering
No reports
5 reports
severe · ~$700

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2017 Acura RDX or the 2017 Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class?

It's close to a tie. Both vehicles score within 0.2 points on our reliability index (4.0 vs 3.9). At this margin, either choice is defensible — base your decision on the specific failure modes that matter to you.

What goes wrong more often on the 2017 Acura RDX?

Compared to the 2017 Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class, the 2017 Acura RDX sees more reported issues in powertrain and brakes. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2017 Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class?

Compared to the 2017 Acura RDX, the 2017 Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class has more complaints in electrical and engine. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

Both vehicles have 0 active recalls. Total recall count alone isn't a great signal — what matters is severity. See the recall counts by severity in the comparison table.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $11,050 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. Verify each vehicle's federal record: 2017 Acura RDX on NHTSA · 2017 Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class on NHTSA. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →
Sponsored — we earn a commission if you complete a quote. Disclosure.