Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Direct rivals · Direct rivals in the compact sedan segment

2017 Kia Forte vs 2017 Volkswagen Jetta

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-06-28 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2017 Kia Forte and 2017 Volkswagen Jetta are nearly tied on reliability data

Two direct rivals running close on the data. Reliability scores are within rounding distance (3.6 versus 3.5), and both have similar complaint patterns. At this margin, choose based on what specifically matters to your use case rather than overall scoring.

2017 Kia Forte

3.6/5
Reliability score
300 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$11,800 repair exposure
vs

2017 Volkswagen Jetta

3.5/5
Reliability score
158 complaints
4 recalls (0 critical)
$13,750 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

Direct rivals running close enough that you'd be fine either way. Reliability scores within rounding distance (3.6 for the 2017 Kia Forte, 3.5 for the 2017 Volkswagen Jetta). When two vehicles in the same segment land this close, the data alone won't pick a winner.

If you lean 2017 Kia Forte, know what you're getting into on engine and electrical. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2017 Volkswagen Jetta sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2017 Volkswagen Jetta? Watch the powertrain and steering. The 2017 Kia Forte has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 1.2x higher on the 2017 Volkswagen Jetta. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: pick based on use case more than the spec sheet. If you tow heavy and don't want to think about it, that's one calculation. If you're a daily driver and want the cheapest path forward, that's another. Both of these will get you down the road. We're just telling you where each one is most likely to break.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2017 Kia Forte
2017 Volkswagen Jetta
engine
110 reports
severe · ~$3,100
19 reports
severe · ~$3,100
electrical
43 reports
severe · ~$850
24 reports
severe · ~$850
lighting
29 reports
severe · ~$250
No reports
airbags
16 reports
critical · ~$1,100
12 reports
severe · ~$1,100
powertrain
11 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
13 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
steering
9 reports
severe · ~$700
14 reports
critical · ~$700
cruise control
12 reports
moderate · ~$600
4 reports
severe · ~$600
fuel system
No reports
11 reports
moderate · ~$1,200
body
6 reports
moderate · ~$1,500
No reports
brakes
No reports
6 reports
severe · ~$450

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2017 Kia Forte or the 2017 Volkswagen Jetta?

It's close to a tie. Both vehicles score within 0.2 points on our reliability index (3.6 vs 3.5). At this margin, either choice is defensible — base your decision on the specific failure modes that matter to you.

What goes wrong more often on the 2017 Kia Forte?

Compared to the 2017 Volkswagen Jetta, the 2017 Kia Forte sees more reported issues in engine and electrical. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2017 Volkswagen Jetta?

Compared to the 2017 Kia Forte, the 2017 Volkswagen Jetta has more complaints in powertrain and steering. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2017 Volkswagen Jetta has more active recalls (4 vs 0). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $13,750 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. Verify each vehicle's federal record: 2017 Kia Forte on NHTSA · 2017 Volkswagen Jetta on NHTSA. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Sponsored
Get a free warranty quote →