Tl* the contact owns a 2008 Ford expedition. While the vehicle was undergoing routine maintenance, the mechanic discovered that the entire sub frame was rusted and corroded. The cause of the failure was not diagnosed the vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was notified. The failure mileage was 97,300. Updated 01/27/17*lj *cn
2008 Ford Expedition body problems
severe 31 complaints filed with NHTSA · avg repair $1,500 · see body across all vehicles →
When does it fail?
Of the 31 body complaints filed for the 2008 Ford Expedition, here's the actual mileage breakdown — failures cluster heaviest at 75,000-100,000 mi.
Each bar shows the share of total complaints filed at that mileage range. Peak failure window highlighted. Some owners report problems earlier; some make it well past 150,000 miles symptom-free. Maintenance habits and driving conditions shift the curve as much as mileage alone.
Of the 14 model years of Ford Expedition we track for body problems, this one carries the most owner complaints on file — 31.
Owners have filed 31 body complaints with NHTSA against this vehicle, but no formal recall covers the issue — the federal record reflects what manufacturers have admitted, not everything owners are reporting.
The failure pattern owners describe
Buyer takeaway: Paint failure on aluminum hood and tailgate is the dominant issue, affecting multiple owners across different mileage ranges with inconsistent warranty coverage; interior door handles break unpredictably, and some affected VINs were excluded from the recall. Before buying, verify paint condition on hood and tailgate, check door handle operation, and inspect rocker panels and undercarriage for corrosion.
Paint defects dominate the complaints. Multiple owners report blistering, bubbling, and peeling on aluminum hood and tailgate panels—often starting between 80,000 and 95,000 miles, though some appear much earlier. One owner had a body shop measure paint thickness at 11–14.5 mills versus the 3–3.5 mill factory spec, indicating multiple repainting cycles at the plant without proper surface prep. Underneath the failed paint sits visible corrosion and rust. Some owners got repairs covered under warranty or dealer discretion; others were told paint is not a covered defect after one year despite extended warranty.
Interior door handles break with minimal force across multiple doors on the same vehicle. A recall exists (campaign 08V058000) but excluded some VINs, leaving owners unable to exit from inside their vehicles.
Corrosion appears in rocker panels, hood latches, and subframes—one body shop warned a hood latch could fail and allow the hood to open while driving. Water leaks into doors and roof vents after rain. Running boards occasionally fail to deploy, and one incident resulted in occupant injury when the step was not present as expected. A poorly designed floor mat hook allows mats to shift and block the brake pedal, leading to one accident.
Same Ford Expedition body reports on nearby years: 2005 · 2006
Failure modes owners describe
Paint defects on aluminum hood and tailgate
Factory paint application failures on aluminum body panels (hood and rear liftgate/tailgate) causing blistering, bubbling, peeling, flaking, and corrosion. Multiple owners report paint thickness measurements as high as 11–14.5 mills vs. factory spec of 3–3.5 mills, indicating multiple repaint cycles at the factory. Paint fails to adhere to aluminum surfaces, exposing bare metal and leading to rust/corrosion underneath.
When: Typically 80,000–95,000+ miles; some observed as early as in-warranty periods; one owner noticed issue 14 months after purchase from dealer
Symptoms owners cite: Paint bubbling and blistering on hood and tailgate; Paint peeling and flaking off hood and tailgate; Sandy or gritty appearance under paint; Dimples and crater-like holes in paint (caused by air bubbles); Visible corrosion and oxidation of aluminum beneath failed paint; Paint failure concentrated on aluminum panels (hood, tailgate); steel panels remain intact
Repairs/costs cited: Body shop measurements show excessive paint buildup (11–14.5 mills) vs. spec (3–3.5 mills), indicating factory repainting without proper surface prep. Full repaint or replacement of aluminum panels required. Some owners report dealers refused warranty coverage after 1 year, even within extended warranty when corrosion became visible. Estimated cost for paint job reported as expensive by at least one owner; others pursued dealer or Ford corporate remedies with inconsistent approval.
Recalls/TSBs owners mention: Ford has inconsistently denied claims, stating paint is not covered after 1 year and/or citing insufficient complaints to issue a recall. Some owners report dealer inspection confirmed factory defect but Ford rep found no issue on reassessment. At least one owner reports other Expedition owners had repairs completed at no cost, but owner's VIN excluded.
Interior door handle fracture and breakage
Interior door handles (driver-side, passenger-side front and rear) fracture and break off in owner's hands with minimal or no force. Failures occur on multiple doors of the same vehicle over a period of years, leaving occupants unable to exit from inside the vehicle. There was an NHTSA recall campaign 08V058000 for interior door latches, but some VINs were excluded from coverage.
When: 2011–2017; earliest report at unspecified mileage, another at 73,000 miles
Symptoms owners cite: Interior door handle stops functioning (will not unlatch door); Interior door handle breaks off in occupant's hand; Multiple handles break on same vehicle over time; Occupants trapped inside vehicle; must use exterior handle to exit
Repairs/costs cited: Replacement of interior door latch handles required. No repair costs cited by owners.
Recalls/TSBs owners mention: NHTSA recall campaign 08V058000 exists for interior door latches/locks/linkages on some 2008 Ford Expedition models, but affected owners report their VINs were explicitly excluded from recall coverage. Ford offered no further assistance to excluded VINs.
Automatic running board failure to deploy
Factory-installed automatic deploying running boards on driver's side fail to extend when motor activates, leaving an unexpected 12-inch step gap at vehicle exit. Owner reports falling from vehicle when expecting step to be present, sustaining ankle sprain and head injury. A separate incident involves running board retracting suddenly and catching occupant's arm.
When: Timing not specified; one injury reported during exit, one incident during child's toy retrieval
Symptoms owners cite: Running board motor runs but board does not deploy; 12-inch height gap between vehicle and ground when board fails; Board retracts unexpectedly and catches occupant's limb
Repairs/costs cited: Not specified; running board repair or replacement likely required.
Recalls/TSBs owners mention: No manufacturer response documented in narratives. Owner notes this is recurring issue among owners and researched online to confirm.
Rocker panel and subframe corrosion
Rocker panel rusts from inside out; subframe exhibits widespread rust and corrosion discovered during routine maintenance. Both failures occur on aluminum or vulnerable structural components with no root cause diagnosis provided by dealer.
When: Rocker panel failure at 150,000 miles; subframe corrosion at 97,300 miles
Symptoms owners cite: Interior rusting of rocker panel; Widespread rust and corrosion of entire subframe
Repairs/costs cited: Rocker panel replacement needed. Subframe condition documented but vehicle not repaired.
Recalls/TSBs owners mention: Manufacturer declined assistance due to mileage exceeding warranty limits (>100,000 miles).
Hood latch and bracket corrosion
Hood latch bolts and hood-holding bracket exhibit corrosion and oxidation under paint. Body shop personnel report latch corrosion could eventually fail, allowing hood to open while driving. Fender bracket also shows light to moderate corrosion.
When: Observed at approximately 70,000–112,000 miles
Symptoms owners cite: Visible corrosion around hood latch bolts; Corrosion and oxidation of hood bracket under paint; Light to moderate corrosion on fender bracket
Repairs/costs cited: No repairs documented in narratives; body shop identified risk of hood flying open.
Recalls/TSBs owners mention: Ford stated this is not covered.
Water ingress into doors and roof vents
Water collects inside driver's side rear door with sloshing sound audible; water enters through door weather stripping after rain. Separate complaint reports water entering roof vents and leaking through roof, requiring multiple repair shop visits.
When: Timing not specified
Symptoms owners cite: Water sloshing sound inside rear door; Water exiting bottom of door at weather stripping after rain; Recurring water entry with each rainfall; Water entering roof vents and leaking through roof interior
Repairs/costs cited: Multiple repair shop visits noted but no repair details provided.
Recalls/TSBs owners mention: Not documented.
Floor mat retention and brake pedal interference
Factory floor mat hook is poorly designed and does not securely anchor carpet floor mats. Mats shift and bunch up under driver's feet and brake pedal during driving, blocking brake pedal operation. One owner's son was unable to stop vehicle and struck a brick building. Owner reports Ford acknowledged this is a common occurrence.
When: August 8, 2010
Symptoms owners cite: Floor mat moves and shifts during vehicle operation; Mat bunches up under driver's feet; Mat interference with brake pedal operation; Loss of braking ability
Repairs/costs cited: No repair documented; issue reported to Ford and insurance.
Recalls/TSBs owners mention: Ford acknowledged this was a common occurrence and provided case number for insurance claim.
Synthesized from 31 NHTSA owner complaints — unverified consumer allegations, summarized for patterns. The verbatim filings appear below.
What owners are reporting 1 most recent
Common questions
How serious is the body problem on the 2008 Ford Expedition?
It's a meaningful issue. 31 complaints have been filed and the failure mode causes operational problems for owners. Repairs average $1,500.
At what mileage does the body typically fail?
Across the 23 complaints that reported odometer mileage, most body failures cluster between 50,000 and 94,000 miles, with the median around 73,000. A quarter of owners report trouble before 50,000; a quarter make it past 94,000. Maintenance history matters more than the odometer alone — this is the reported failure window, not a guarantee.
What does it cost to fix?
Independent shops typically charge around $1,500 for body repairs on this vehicle. Dealer pricing tends to run 20-40% higher. The exact figure depends on the specific failure mode, parts availability, and your local labor rates. If you're outside factory warranty, an extended service contract often covers this category.
Are there any recalls related to body?
No active recalls currently cover body issues on this vehicle. The complaints filed represent owner-reported failures that haven't risen to the level of a manufacturer-issued recall — but they're still worth knowing about before you buy or budget for repairs.