Ford is recalling certain model year 2011 f-150, f-250, f-350, f-450, f-550, edge and Lincoln mkx vehicles
If an electrical short develops, an overheating condition may occur which can result in an unattended vehicle fire.
Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.
Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.
moderate Owners of the 2011 Ford Edge have filed 145 NHTSA complaints about the body, typically surfacing around 53,000 miles at roughly $1,500 to repair (U.S. federal records, as of July 2026). Source: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation. See body across all vehicles →
| Model year | body complaints |
|---|---|
| 2007 Edge | 8 |
| 2008 Edge | 6 |
| 2010 Edge | 9 |
| 2011 Edge (this page) | 145 |
| 2012 Edge | 86 |
| 2013 Edge | 160 |
| 2014 Edge | 10 |
| 2015 Edge | 45 |
Of the 145 body complaints filed for the 2011 Ford Edge, here's the actual mileage breakdown — failures cluster heaviest at 50,000-75,000 mi.
Each bar shows the share of total complaints filed at that mileage range. Peak failure window highlighted. Some owners report problems earlier; some make it well past 150,000 miles symptom-free. Maintenance habits and driving conditions shift the curve as much as mileage alone.
Among the 14 model years of Ford Edge in our records for body problems, this one ranks #2 by owner-complaint volume.
Owners have filed 145 body complaints against 1 active recall — roughly 145 complaints per campaign.
If an electrical short develops, an overheating condition may occur which can result in an unattended vehicle fire.
The manufacturer has issued service bulletins covering body on this vehicle — documented repair instructions, service campaigns, or warranty extensions sent to dealers. A TSB isn't a recall (it's not a free safety remedy), but it's the manufacturer acknowledging the issue and how to fix it.
Ford and Lincoln vehicles equipped with wired keyless entry keypad systems and accessory wireless keyless entry keypad systems may or may not come with a wallet card containing the master code. Unlike the integrated wired keypad, the accessory wireless keypad master code cannot be retrieved from the vehicle using a diagnostic scan tool or from the label printed on the body control module (BCM). The Factory Keyless Entry Code application within the diagnostic scan tool will not provide an applicable master code for the accessory wireless keypad. If the wallet card for an accessory keypad is not available, the "Wireless RF Keypad Diagnosis Guide" can be referenced and provides direction on how
full bulletin at NHTSA ↗For 2000-2024 Ford and Lincoln vehicles, swapping a module from a vehicle for diagnosis purposes is likely to cause errors and is not recommended. It is also not recommended to order a replacement module using a vehicle identification number (VIN) from a different vehicle. Most modules on these affected vehicles are VIN/vehicle specific and hardware variations between modules do exist. Swapping a module from a vehicle or ordering a module using a different vehicle/VIN can cause ineffective repairs and additional vehicle down time. Make sure all appropriate Workshop Manual (WSM) procedures are followed when diagnosing the condition prior to all module replacements and only order modules using
full bulletin at NHTSA ↗This article supersedes TSB 19-2026 to update the vehicle model years affected. Some 2000 and newer Ford/Lincoln/Mercury vehicles equipped with aluminum body panels may exhibit corrosion concerns appearing as bubbled and/or peeling paint with or without accompanying white dust. Panel replacement is recommended.
full bulletin at NHTSA ↗Customer Satisfaction Program 19N09 Certain 2011-2014 Model Year Edge and MKX and 2013-2014 Model Year Explorer, Flex, and MKT Vehicles Left Front Door Latch Extended Coverage
full bulletin at NHTSA ↗Some 2000 and newer Ford, Lincoln and Mercury vehicles equipped with aluminum body panels may exhibit corrosion concerns appearing as bubbled and/or peeling paint with or without accompanying white dust. Panel replacement is recommended. Follow the Service Procedure steps to correct the condition
full bulletin at NHTSA ↗Source: NHTSA manufacturer communications. Bring the bulletin number to your dealer or shop.
The 2011 Ford Edge shows a dominant pattern of door latch sensor failures across driver, passenger, and rear doors. Owners describe the door-ajar warning light staying lit indefinitely despite the door being fully closed, preventing automatic locks and leaving interior lights on continuously—which drains the battery and creates nighttime visibility hazards. Many owners report opening and closing the door repeatedly or slamming it hard to clear the false warning. The sensor exists inside the door latch assembly; Ford will only replace the entire latch module at $400–$500 per door. Dealerships confirm Ford is aware of this as a known, widespread issue, yet no recall has been issued. One owner had the same latch replaced under warranty, only to have it fail again 13 months later. Several owners mention the part becoming difficult to source, with one vehicle stranded at a dealership for two months waiting for a discontinued part.
Beyond door latches, owners report a throttle body failure causing sudden complete loss of engine power while driving (restored by restart), a sunroof that spontaneously cracked and spider-webbed at highway speed with no visible impact, and significant undercarriage corrosion that caused a jack to fail during a routine tire change. One owner also describes cascading electrical failures—rear-view camera blanking, power seat memory loss, mirror readjustment—tied to body control module failure. NHTSA Campaign 10V659000 exists for this vehicle but remains incomplete on some cars due to discontinued parts.
Same Ford Edge body reports on nearby years: 2012 · 2013 · 2014
Door ajar warning light illuminates and remains on despite door being fully closed. Owners report the sensor in the door latch assembly fails to register proper door closure. This is the single most prevalent complaint across the 145-complaint cluster, affecting all door positions (driver, passenger, rear). Complaints indicate the fault is in the internal limit switch within the door latch module.
When: Failure typically begins between 19,000–83,000 miles; most commonly reported around 45,000–75,000 miles. One complaint noted failure at just 1,000 miles over factory warranty expiration.
Symptoms owners cite: Door ajar warning light stays illuminated when door is closed; Interior dome lights remain on continuously or for extended periods after exiting vehicle; Doors will not lock automatically during motion or will not lock via manual switches; Interior lights create visibility hazard at night, especially during backing/reversing; Battery drain from lights remaining on; Intermittent failures that worsen over time to constant failures; Requires slamming door repeatedly or opening/closing multiple times to clear warning
Repairs/costs cited: Door latch assembly replacement only remedy; cannot replace sensor alone. Dealer cost typically $400–$500 per door. One owner reported latch replacement failed to resolve issue long-term; same problem recurred 13 months later. Parts reportedly difficult to source; one case involved vehicle stranded at dealer for two months waiting for discontinued part. Extended warranties do not cover this defect.
Recalls/TSBs owners mention: NHTSA Campaign 10V659000 (Structure) pertains to this vehicle; however repair parts were discontinued, preventing full recall completion on some vehicles. Ford has issued Technical Service Bulletin (TSB) 14-0083 acknowledging the problem but refuses formal recall. Dealerships confirm Ford is aware of the widespread nature of the issue. No recall exists despite the safety implications. Some owners report being denied warranty coverage or recall repair due to mileage limits on recall eligibility.
Body control module becomes inoperable, causing cascading electrical failures. One narrative explicitly links this failure to NHTSA Campaign 10V659000 (Structure). Associated symptoms include rear-view camera blanking, mirror readjustment at startup, power seat memory loss, power window failure, and abnormal wire-burning odor.
When: Approximately 120,000 miles.
Symptoms owners cite: Rear-view camera displays blank image in reverse; Side mirrors readjust unexpectedly at startup; Power seat settings fail to remain programmed; Power windows fail to operate as needed; Abnormal wire-burning odor from vehicle; BCM completely inoperable
Repairs/costs cited: No repair completed; vehicle not repaired at time of complaint.
Recalls/TSBs owners mention: NHTSA Campaign 10V659000 (Structure) associated with this failure. Manufacturer notified but provided no assistance or guidance.
Sunroof panel spontaneously cracked and failed while vehicle was traveling at highway speed on undamaged road under normal conditions. Owner heard loud noise and discovered spider-webbed damage with gap already forming at front edge.
When: During normal highway driving at 55 mph; no identified impact or debris.
Symptoms owners cite: Loud explosion-like sound while driving; Spontaneous spider-webbing of sunroof glass; Gap forming at front edge of sunroof panel; No external damage to tires or windows
Repairs/costs cited: Not specified.
Vehicle could not be registered due to incomplete NHTSA Campaign 10V659000 (Structure) recall. Dealership could not complete repair because the required part had been discontinued by manufacturer. Vehicle stranded at dealership for two months with no resolution or manufacturer assistance. Owner informed VIN could not be removed from recall registry.
When: During vehicle registration.
Symptoms owners cite: Vehicle flagged as having incomplete safety recall at registration; Cannot obtain registration due to unresolved recall; Repair parts unavailable/discontinued
Repairs/costs cited: Repair could not be completed; required part discontinued. Vehicle immobilized at dealership for extended period.
Recalls/TSBs owners mention: NHTSA Campaign 10V659000 (Structure). Manufacturer provided no assistance; VIN cannot be removed from recall system despite parts being unavailable.
Engine loses power suddenly while driving; power restored after restart. Dealership diagnosed throttle body as faulty. Complaint references a potential recall (10V659000) and notes North Carolina Consumer Council filing petition for investigation.
When: Incident occurred multiple times over short period; one owner reported 4 occurrences in a single day.
Symptoms owners cite: Complete loss of engine power while driving; Power restored after turning vehicle off and restarting; Episodic, initially sporadic, then increasing in frequency
Repairs/costs cited: Throttle body replacement cost $622.59. Vehicle out of warranty.
Recalls/TSBs owners mention: No recalls found by dealership at time of complaint, though complaint owner references potential recall 10V659000 and notes North Carolina Consumer Council investigation petition.
Significant corrosion of undercarriage framework including jack-mounting area. During routine tire change, vehicle fell when jack was placed on corroded section, bending the jack. Owner concerns about structural integrity and potential hidden corrosion affecting safety during driving.
When: Noted on vehicle with approximately normal service life at time of tire change.
Symptoms owners cite: Visible heavy corrosion in multiple undercarriage areas; Deterioration of jack-mounting points; Framework degradation
Repairs/costs cited: No repair documented. Owner concerned about hard impact damage from vehicle falling on concrete.
Synthesized from 145 NHTSA owner complaints — unverified consumer allegations, summarized for patterns. The verbatim filings appear below.
The driver door sensor is not working correctly. The driver door ajar notification remains on once the door is closed, and the interior light will not turn off. I also cannot lock my doors. I end up driving with the interior light on because it will not go out. At night time, this is especially dangerous, not to mention it drains the battery by staying on when not being driven. When I exit the…
Door ajar light stays on all the time even when door is closed all the way. Interior lights stay on. Now the back up camera says it unavailable or shows upside down. *js
Takata recall the driver's side door latch does not work properly causing the alarm to go off unexpectedly, as well as "door ajar" displayed when you get into the vehicle and close the door. Manually flipping the switch up with fingers sometimes works, but not reliable and seems to be a concern for driving down the interstate hearing air coming in because the door isn't securely latched. This…
It's a documented issue but not catastrophic. 145 complaints have been filed. Repairs average $1,500 and most owners catch it before it causes a breakdown.
Across the 108 complaints that reported odometer mileage, most body failures cluster between 39,917 and 77,000 miles, with the median around 53,000. A quarter of owners report trouble before 39,917; a quarter make it past 77,000. Maintenance history matters more than the odometer alone — this is the reported failure window, not a guarantee.
Independent shops typically charge around $1,500 for body repairs on this vehicle. Dealer pricing tends to run 20-40% higher. The exact figure depends on the specific failure mode, parts availability, and your local labor rates. If you're outside factory warranty, an extended service contract often covers this category.
Yes — 1 active recall(s) cover body issues on this vehicle. Recall fixes are always free regardless of mileage or warranty status. Use the VIN decoder at the top of the page to check if your specific vehicle is affected.