Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Direct rivals · Direct rivals in the midsize sedan segment

2009 Chevrolet Malibu vs 2009 Toyota Camry

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-05-03 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2009 Chevrolet Malibu and 2009 Toyota Camry are nearly tied on reliability data

Two direct rivals running close on the data. Reliability scores are within rounding distance (3.1 versus 3.3), and both have similar complaint patterns. At this margin, choose based on what specifically matters to your use case rather than overall scoring.

2009 Chevrolet Malibu

3.1/5
Reliability score
1,507 complaints
2 recalls (0 critical)
$14,550 repair exposure
vs

2009 Toyota Camry

3.3/5
Reliability score
1,407 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$15,050 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

Direct rivals running close enough that you'd be fine either way. Reliability scores within rounding distance (3.1 for the 2009 Chevrolet Malibu, 3.3 for the 2009 Toyota Camry). When two vehicles in the same segment land this close, the data alone won't pick a winner.

If you lean 2009 Chevrolet Malibu, know what you're getting into on steering and electrical. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2009 Toyota Camry sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2009 Toyota Camry? Watch the cruise control and engine. The 2009 Chevrolet Malibu has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

Bottom line: pick based on use case more than the spec sheet. If you tow heavy and don't want to think about it, that's one calculation. If you're a daily driver and want the cheapest path forward, that's another. Both of these will get you down the road. We're just telling you where each one is most likely to break.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2009 Chevrolet Malibu
2009 Toyota Camry
steering
767 reports
moderate · ~$700
No reports
electrical
250 reports
moderate · ~$850
79 reports
severe · ~$850
cruise control
26 reports
moderate · ~$600
243 reports
critical · ~$600
engine
24 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
224 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
body
No reports
218 reports
moderate · ~$1,500
brakes
36 reports
moderate · ~$450
97 reports
severe · ~$450
airbags
47 reports
critical · ~$1,100
63 reports
severe · ~$1,100
powertrain
98 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
No reports
lighting
83 reports
moderate · ~$250
No reports
visibility
No reports
82 reports
moderate · ~$350

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2009 Chevrolet Malibu or the 2009 Toyota Camry?

It's close to a tie. Both vehicles score within 0.2 points on our reliability index (3.1 vs 3.3). At this margin, either choice is defensible — base your decision on the specific failure modes that matter to you.

What goes wrong more often on the 2009 Chevrolet Malibu?

Compared to the 2009 Toyota Camry, the 2009 Chevrolet Malibu sees more reported issues in steering and electrical. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2009 Toyota Camry?

Compared to the 2009 Chevrolet Malibu, the 2009 Toyota Camry has more complaints in cruise control and engine. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2009 Chevrolet Malibu has more active recalls (2 vs 0). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $15,050 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →