Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Cross-comparison · Comparison spans different vehicle types

2009 Ford Fusion vs 2009 Mercury Milan

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-06-28 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
The 2009 Mercury Milan edges this one on reliability data

Reliability data favors the 2009 Mercury Milan (3.7 versus 3.3). These vehicles aren't a typical head-to-head comparison, but if you're cross-shopping them, the data is what it is.

2009 Ford Fusion

3.3/5
Reliability score
1,020 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$13,800 repair exposure
vs
More reliable

2009 Mercury Milan

3.7/5
Reliability score
226 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$4,500 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

The 2009 Mercury Milan edges this comparison on reliability data (3.7 versus 3.3). These aren't a typical head-to-head, but if you're cross-shopping them, the data is what it is.

If you lean 2009 Ford Fusion, know what you're getting into on brakes and airbags. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2009 Mercury Milan sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 3.1x higher on the 2009 Ford Fusion. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: pick based on use case more than the spec sheet. If you tow heavy and don't want to think about it, that's one calculation. If you're a daily driver and want the cheapest path forward, that's another. Both of these will get you down the road. We're just telling you where each one is most likely to break.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

When does brakes fail?

Failure-mileage distribution for brakes, side by side. The 2009 Ford Fusion peaks at 100,000-125,000 mi; the 2009 Mercury Milan peaks at 75,000-100,000 mi.

2009 Ford Fusion(16)2009 Mercury Milan(12)
0-25k
0%
0%
25-50k
0%
25%
50-75k
0%
8.3%
75-100k
25%
41.7%
100-125k
43.8%
0%
125-150k
25%
16.7%
150k+
6.3%
8.3%

Each bar is the share of that vehicle's mileage-bearing complaints filed in that bucket. Peak buckets are darker. Bar lengths share one scale so absolute comparison is direct — a longer bar means a higher proportion of all complaints landed there.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2009 Ford Fusion
2009 Mercury Milan
brakes
494 reports
severe · ~$450
109 reports
severe · ~$450
airbags
346 reports
severe · ~$1,100
85 reports
severe · ~$1,100
body
31 reports
severe · ~$1,500
6 reports
severe · ~$1,500
cruise control
20 reports
severe · ~$600
10 reports
severe · ~$600
electrical
17 reports
severe · ~$850
3 reports
severe · ~$850
powertrain
19 reports
severe · ~$2,500
No reports
engine
17 reports
severe · ~$3,100
No reports
steering
16 reports
severe · ~$700
No reports

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2009 Ford Fusion or the 2009 Mercury Milan?

Based on the NHTSA data we track, the 2009 Mercury Milan comes out ahead with a reliability score of 3.7 versus 3.3. The margin is narrow, so the verdict could shift if you weight specific categories differently or factor in your own use case.

What goes wrong more often on the 2009 Ford Fusion?

Compared to the 2009 Mercury Milan, the 2009 Ford Fusion sees more reported issues in brakes and airbags. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2009 Mercury Milan?

On the categories we tracked, the 2009 Mercury Milan doesn't show meaningfully more complaints than the 2009 Ford Fusion. The two are running close.

Which has more recalls?

Both vehicles have 0 active recalls. Total recall count alone isn't a great signal — what matters is severity. See the recall counts by severity in the comparison table.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $13,800 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. Verify each vehicle's federal record: 2009 Ford Fusion on NHTSA · 2009 Mercury Milan on NHTSA. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Sponsored
Get a free warranty quote →