Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Different vehicle classes · Different segments — choice depends on use case

2010 Mazda Mazda6 vs 2010 Toyota Camry

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-06-14 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2010 Mazda Mazda6 versus 2010 Toyota Camry — different vehicles, different jobs

These two come from different segments, which makes a direct reliability comparison less meaningful than usual. Showing the data so you can see what each one is good at and where each one breaks down. The reliability scores (3.4 versus 3.4) reflect different testing populations and use patterns — don't treat them as apples-to-apples.

2010 Mazda Mazda6

3.4/5
Reliability score
224 complaints
3 recalls (0 critical)
$9,250 repair exposure
vs

2010 Toyota Camry

3.4/5
Reliability score
610 complaints
1 recalls (0 critical)
$14,150 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

These come from different vehicle segments, which means we're not declaring a winner here. The 2010 Mazda Mazda6 scores 3.4; the 2010 Toyota Camry scores 3.4. Different testing populations, different driving patterns, different categories of failure. Use the data below to understand what each one is good at and what each one breaks.

If you lean 2010 Mazda Mazda6, know what you're getting into on airbags and steering. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2010 Toyota Camry sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2010 Toyota Camry? Watch the cruise control and body. The 2010 Mazda Mazda6 has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 1.5x higher on the 2010 Toyota Camry. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: these are different categories of vehicle. Pick based on what you actually need it for. We're showing the reliability data so you can factor in long-term ownership cost, not pick a winner.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2010 Mazda Mazda6
2010 Toyota Camry
cruise control
No reports
137 reports
severe · ~$600
airbags
52 reports
severe · ~$1,100
42 reports
severe · ~$1,100
body
37 reports
moderate · ~$1,500
55 reports
moderate · ~$1,500
visibility
No reports
58 reports
moderate · ~$350
suspension
25 reports
moderate · ~$900
31 reports
severe · ~$900
engine
No reports
49 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
brakes
8 reports
moderate · ~$450
39 reports
severe · ~$450
powertrain
4 reports
severe · ~$2,500
39 reports
severe · ~$2,500
steering
29 reports
moderate · ~$700
No reports
lighting
19 reports
severe · ~$250
No reports

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2010 Mazda Mazda6 or the 2010 Toyota Camry?

It's close to a tie. Both vehicles score within 0.2 points on our reliability index (3.4 vs 3.4). At this margin, either choice is defensible — base your decision on the specific failure modes that matter to you.

What goes wrong more often on the 2010 Mazda Mazda6?

Compared to the 2010 Toyota Camry, the 2010 Mazda Mazda6 sees more reported issues in airbags and steering. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2010 Toyota Camry?

Compared to the 2010 Mazda Mazda6, the 2010 Toyota Camry has more complaints in cruise control and body. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2010 Mazda Mazda6 has more active recalls (3 vs 1). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $14,150 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. Verify each vehicle's federal record: 2010 Mazda Mazda6 on NHTSA · 2010 Toyota Camry on NHTSA. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →
Sponsored — we earn a commission if you complete a quote. Disclosure.