Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Different vehicle classes · Different segments — choice depends on use case

2011 Chevrolet Equinox vs 2011 Subaru Forester

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-06-14 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2011 Chevrolet Equinox versus 2011 Subaru Forester — different vehicles, different jobs

These two come from different segments, which makes a direct reliability comparison less meaningful than usual. Showing the data so you can see what each one is good at and where each one breaks down. The reliability scores (3.3 versus 3.8) reflect different testing populations and use patterns — don't treat them as apples-to-apples.

2011 Chevrolet Equinox

3.3/5
Reliability score
779 complaints
1 recalls (0 critical)
$14,800 repair exposure
vs

2011 Subaru Forester

3.8/5
Reliability score
147 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$10,950 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

These come from different vehicle segments, which means we're not declaring a winner here. The 2011 Chevrolet Equinox scores 3.3; the 2011 Subaru Forester scores 3.8. Different testing populations, different driving patterns, different categories of failure. Use the data below to understand what each one is good at and what each one breaks.

If you lean 2011 Chevrolet Equinox, know what you're getting into on engine and powertrain. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2011 Subaru Forester sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2011 Subaru Forester? Watch the body and seatbelts. The 2011 Chevrolet Equinox has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 1.4x higher on the 2011 Chevrolet Equinox. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: these are different categories of vehicle. Pick based on what you actually need it for. We're showing the reliability data so you can factor in long-term ownership cost, not pick a winner.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2011 Chevrolet Equinox
2011 Subaru Forester
engine
273 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
50 reports
severe · ~$3,100
powertrain
135 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
7 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
airbags
48 reports
severe · ~$1,100
29 reports
moderate · ~$1,100
visibility
68 reports
moderate · ~$350
No reports
electrical
54 reports
severe · ~$850
9 reports
severe · ~$850
steering
43 reports
severe · ~$700
No reports
cruise control
32 reports
severe · ~$600
10 reports
severe · ~$600
brakes
11 reports
severe · ~$450
12 reports
severe · ~$450
body
No reports
5 reports
severe · ~$1,500
seatbelts
No reports
3 reports
severe · ~$500

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2011 Chevrolet Equinox or the 2011 Subaru Forester?

Based on the NHTSA data we track, the 2011 Subaru Forester comes out ahead with a reliability score of 3.8 versus 3.3. The margin is clear, so the verdict could shift if you weight specific categories differently or factor in your own use case.

What goes wrong more often on the 2011 Chevrolet Equinox?

Compared to the 2011 Subaru Forester, the 2011 Chevrolet Equinox sees more reported issues in engine and powertrain. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2011 Subaru Forester?

Compared to the 2011 Chevrolet Equinox, the 2011 Subaru Forester has more complaints in body and seatbelts. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2011 Chevrolet Equinox has more active recalls (1 vs 0). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $14,800 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. Verify each vehicle's federal record: 2011 Chevrolet Equinox on NHTSA · 2011 Subaru Forester on NHTSA. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →
Sponsored — we earn a commission if you complete a quote. Disclosure.