2013 Acura MDX vs 2013 Audi Q5
Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.
2013 Acura MDX
2013 Audi Q5
Stories from the shop
The 2013 Acura MDX edges this one, but it's tight. We're talking 4.2 versus 3.9 on reliability. Close enough that specific feature preferences or one favorable price could legitimately swing it the other way.
Going with the 2013 Audi Q5? Watch the engine and steering. The 2013 Acura MDX has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.
On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 1.3x higher on the 2013 Audi Q5. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.
Bottom line: pick based on use case more than the spec sheet. If you tow heavy and don't want to think about it, that's one calculation. If you're a daily driver and want the cheapest path forward, that's another. Both of these will get you down the road. We're just telling you where each one is most likely to break.
Side-by-side by problem area
Common questions
Which is more reliable, the 2013 Acura MDX or the 2013 Audi Q5?
Based on the NHTSA data we track, the 2013 Acura MDX comes out ahead with a reliability score of 4.2 versus 3.9. The margin is narrow, so the verdict could shift if you weight specific categories differently or factor in your own use case.
What goes wrong more often on the 2013 Acura MDX?
On the categories we tracked, the 2013 Acura MDX doesn't show meaningfully more complaints than the 2013 Audi Q5. Both have similar issue patterns.
What goes wrong more often on the 2013 Audi Q5?
Compared to the 2013 Acura MDX, the 2013 Audi Q5 has more complaints in engine and steering. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.
Which has more recalls?
Both vehicles have 0 active recalls. Total recall count alone isn't a great signal — what matters is severity. See the recall counts by severity in the comparison table.
Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?
Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $9,100 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.