Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Direct rivals · Direct rivals in the luxury suv segment

2013 Acura RDX vs 2013 Audi Q5

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-06-14 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2013 Acura RDX and 2013 Audi Q5 are nearly tied on reliability data

Two direct rivals running close on the data. Reliability scores are within rounding distance (3.8 versus 3.9), and both have similar complaint patterns. At this margin, choose based on what specifically matters to your use case rather than overall scoring.

2013 Acura RDX

3.8/5
Reliability score
161 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$5,950 repair exposure
vs

2013 Audi Q5

3.9/5
Reliability score
92 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$9,100 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

Direct rivals running close enough that you'd be fine either way. Reliability scores within rounding distance (3.8 for the 2013 Acura RDX, 3.9 for the 2013 Audi Q5). When two vehicles in the same segment land this close, the data alone won't pick a winner.

If you lean 2013 Acura RDX, know what you're getting into on lighting and airbags. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2013 Audi Q5 sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2013 Audi Q5? Watch the engine and steering. The 2013 Acura RDX has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 1.5x higher on the 2013 Audi Q5. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: pick based on use case more than the spec sheet. If you tow heavy and don't want to think about it, that's one calculation. If you're a daily driver and want the cheapest path forward, that's another. Both of these will get you down the road. We're just telling you where each one is most likely to break.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2013 Acura RDX
2013 Audi Q5
lighting
89 reports
moderate · ~$250
No reports
airbags
34 reports
severe · ~$1,100
No reports
engine
No reports
25 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
steering
No reports
19 reports
severe · ~$700
electrical
6 reports
severe · ~$850
10 reports
severe · ~$850
powertrain
5 reports
severe · ~$2,500
5 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
body
No reports
7 reports
moderate · ~$1,500
suspension
6 reports
moderate · ~$900
No reports
brakes
No reports
6 reports
moderate · ~$450
visibility
5 reports
moderate · ~$350
No reports

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2013 Acura RDX or the 2013 Audi Q5?

It's close to a tie. Both vehicles score within 0.2 points on our reliability index (3.8 vs 3.9). At this margin, either choice is defensible — base your decision on the specific failure modes that matter to you.

What goes wrong more often on the 2013 Acura RDX?

Compared to the 2013 Audi Q5, the 2013 Acura RDX sees more reported issues in lighting and airbags. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2013 Audi Q5?

Compared to the 2013 Acura RDX, the 2013 Audi Q5 has more complaints in engine and steering. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

Both vehicles have 0 active recalls. Total recall count alone isn't a great signal — what matters is severity. See the recall counts by severity in the comparison table.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $9,100 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. Verify each vehicle's federal record: 2013 Acura RDX on NHTSA · 2013 Audi Q5 on NHTSA. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →
Sponsored — we earn a commission if you complete a quote. Disclosure.