Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Direct rivals · Direct rivals in the full size suv segment

2013 GMC Acadia vs 2013 Nissan Pathfinder

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-06-14 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2013 GMC Acadia clearly comes out ahead on reliability data

Two trucks built for the same buyer, and the data tells a clear story. The 2013 GMC Acadia edges the 2013 Nissan Pathfinder on reliability scoring (3.8 versus 3.2) with meaningful gaps in complaint volume and severity. Real differences, not noise.

More reliable

2013 GMC Acadia

3.8/5
Reliability score
137 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$10,600 repair exposure
vs

2013 Nissan Pathfinder

3.2/5
Reliability score
888 complaints
2 recalls (0 critical)
$13,900 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

If I'm picking between these two head-to-head, I'm taking the 2013 GMC Acadia. Reliability score's a solid 3.8 versus 3.2 on the 2013 Nissan Pathfinder, and the complaint counts back it up — 137 versus 888. That's not noise, that's a real gap between rivals built for the same buyer.

If you lean 2013 GMC Acadia, know what you're getting into on lighting and steering. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2013 Nissan Pathfinder sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2013 Nissan Pathfinder? Watch the powertrain and airbags. The 2013 GMC Acadia has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 1.3x higher on the 2013 Nissan Pathfinder. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: pick based on use case more than the spec sheet. If you tow heavy and don't want to think about it, that's one calculation. If you're a daily driver and want the cheapest path forward, that's another. Both of these will get you down the road. We're just telling you where each one is most likely to break.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2013 GMC Acadia
2013 Nissan Pathfinder
powertrain
26 reports
severe · ~$2,500
360 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
airbags
26 reports
severe · ~$1,100
144 reports
severe · ~$1,100
electrical
34 reports
severe · ~$850
36 reports
moderate · ~$850
body
4 reports
severe · ~$1,500
63 reports
moderate · ~$1,500
engine
7 reports
severe · ~$3,100
36 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
visibility
No reports
37 reports
moderate · ~$350
brakes
No reports
35 reports
severe · ~$450
suspension
No reports
25 reports
moderate · ~$900
lighting
8 reports
moderate · ~$250
No reports
steering
8 reports
moderate · ~$700
No reports

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2013 GMC Acadia or the 2013 Nissan Pathfinder?

Based on the NHTSA data we track, the 2013 GMC Acadia comes out ahead with a reliability score of 3.8 versus 3.2. The margin is clear, so the verdict could shift if you weight specific categories differently or factor in your own use case.

What goes wrong more often on the 2013 GMC Acadia?

Compared to the 2013 Nissan Pathfinder, the 2013 GMC Acadia sees more reported issues in lighting and steering. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2013 Nissan Pathfinder?

Compared to the 2013 GMC Acadia, the 2013 Nissan Pathfinder has more complaints in powertrain and airbags. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2013 Nissan Pathfinder has more active recalls (2 vs 0). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $13,900 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. Verify each vehicle's federal record: 2013 GMC Acadia on NHTSA · 2013 Nissan Pathfinder on NHTSA. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →
Sponsored — we earn a commission if you complete a quote. Disclosure.