Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Direct rivals · Direct rivals in the full size suv segment

2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs 2014 Toyota 4Runner

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-06-08 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2014 Toyota 4Runner clearly comes out ahead on reliability data

Two trucks built for the same buyer, and the data tells a clear story. The 2014 Toyota 4Runner edges the 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee on reliability scoring (4.0 versus 2.1) with meaningful gaps in complaint volume and severity. Real differences, not noise.

2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee

2.1/5
Reliability score
2,362 complaints
10 recalls (0 critical)
$14,900 repair exposure
vs
More reliable

2014 Toyota 4Runner

4.0/5
Reliability score
76 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$6,150 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

If I'm picking between these two head-to-head, I'm taking the 2014 Toyota 4Runner. Reliability score's a solid 4.0 versus 2.1 on the 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee, and the complaint counts back it up — 76 versus 2,362. That's not noise, that's a real gap between rivals built for the same buyer.

If you lean 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee, know what you're getting into on powertrain and electrical. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2014 Toyota 4Runner sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2014 Toyota 4Runner? Watch the body and fuel system. The 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 2.4x higher on the 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: pick based on use case more than the spec sheet. If you tow heavy and don't want to think about it, that's one calculation. If you're a daily driver and want the cheapest path forward, that's another. Both of these will get you down the road. We're just telling you where each one is most likely to break.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee
2014 Toyota 4Runner
powertrain
449 reports
severe · ~$2,500
No reports
electrical
379 reports
severe · ~$850
24 reports
moderate · ~$850
engine
247 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
No reports
airbags
159 reports
severe · ~$1,100
8 reports
severe · ~$1,100
brakes
139 reports
severe · ~$450
3 reports
moderate · ~$450
seatbelts
119 reports
moderate · ~$500
No reports
steering
81 reports
moderate · ~$700
7 reports
moderate · ~$700
cruise control
59 reports
severe · ~$600
No reports
body
No reports
7 reports
severe · ~$1,500
fuel system
No reports
4 reports
moderate · ~$1,200

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee or the 2014 Toyota 4Runner?

Based on the NHTSA data we track, the 2014 Toyota 4Runner comes out ahead with a reliability score of 4.0 versus 2.1. The margin is clear, so the verdict could shift if you weight specific categories differently or factor in your own use case.

What goes wrong more often on the 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee?

Compared to the 2014 Toyota 4Runner, the 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee sees more reported issues in powertrain and electrical. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2014 Toyota 4Runner?

Compared to the 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee, the 2014 Toyota 4Runner has more complaints in body and fuel system. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee has more active recalls (10 vs 0). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $14,900 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. Verify each vehicle's federal record: 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee on NHTSA · 2014 Toyota 4Runner on NHTSA. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →
Sponsored — we earn a commission if you complete a quote. Disclosure.