Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Different vehicle classes · Different segments — choice depends on use case

2016 Chevrolet Colorado vs 2016 Toyota Tundra

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-06-14 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2016 Chevrolet Colorado versus 2016 Toyota Tundra — different vehicles, different jobs

These two come from different segments, which makes a direct reliability comparison less meaningful than usual. Showing the data so you can see what each one is good at and where each one breaks down. The reliability scores (3.3 versus 3.8) reflect different testing populations and use patterns — don't treat them as apples-to-apples.

2016 Chevrolet Colorado

3.3/5
Reliability score
691 complaints
1 recalls (0 critical)
$13,900 repair exposure
vs

2016 Toyota Tundra

3.8/5
Reliability score
117 complaints
1 recalls (0 critical)
$8,650 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

These come from different vehicle segments, which means we're not declaring a winner here. The 2016 Chevrolet Colorado scores 3.3; the 2016 Toyota Tundra scores 3.8. Different testing populations, different driving patterns, different categories of failure. Use the data below to understand what each one is good at and what each one breaks.

If you lean 2016 Chevrolet Colorado, know what you're getting into on steering and powertrain. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2016 Toyota Tundra sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2016 Toyota Tundra? Watch the body and lighting. The 2016 Chevrolet Colorado has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 1.6x higher on the 2016 Chevrolet Colorado. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: these are different categories of vehicle. Pick based on what you actually need it for. We're showing the reliability data so you can factor in long-term ownership cost, not pick a winner.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2016 Chevrolet Colorado
2016 Toyota Tundra
steering
443 reports
moderate · ~$700
7 reports
moderate · ~$700
powertrain
83 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
5 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
electrical
47 reports
moderate · ~$850
25 reports
moderate · ~$850
brakes
26 reports
severe · ~$450
23 reports
moderate · ~$450
body
6 reports
severe · ~$1,500
19 reports
severe · ~$1,500
engine
12 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
No reports
airbags
7 reports
severe · ~$1,100
4 reports
severe · ~$1,100
cruise control
10 reports
moderate · ~$600
No reports
lighting
No reports
9 reports
moderate · ~$250
suspension
No reports
3 reports
moderate · ~$900

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2016 Chevrolet Colorado or the 2016 Toyota Tundra?

Based on the NHTSA data we track, the 2016 Toyota Tundra comes out ahead with a reliability score of 3.8 versus 3.3. The margin is clear, so the verdict could shift if you weight specific categories differently or factor in your own use case.

What goes wrong more often on the 2016 Chevrolet Colorado?

Compared to the 2016 Toyota Tundra, the 2016 Chevrolet Colorado sees more reported issues in steering and powertrain. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2016 Toyota Tundra?

Compared to the 2016 Chevrolet Colorado, the 2016 Toyota Tundra has more complaints in body and lighting. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

Both vehicles have 1 active recalls. Total recall count alone isn't a great signal — what matters is severity. See the recall counts by severity in the comparison table.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $13,900 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. Verify each vehicle's federal record: 2016 Chevrolet Colorado on NHTSA · 2016 Toyota Tundra on NHTSA. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →
Sponsored — we earn a commission if you complete a quote. Disclosure.