Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Direct rivals · Direct rivals in the full size suv segment

2016 Ford Explorer vs 2016 GMC Acadia

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-06-14 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2016 GMC Acadia clearly comes out ahead on reliability data

Two trucks built for the same buyer, and the data tells a clear story. The 2016 GMC Acadia edges the 2016 Ford Explorer on reliability scoring (3.7 versus 2.5) with meaningful gaps in complaint volume and severity. Real differences, not noise.

2016 Ford Explorer

2.5/5
Reliability score
2,412 complaints
6 recalls (0 critical)
$14,550 repair exposure
vs
More reliable

2016 GMC Acadia

3.7/5
Reliability score
232 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$9,200 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

If I'm picking between these two head-to-head, I'm taking the 2016 GMC Acadia. Reliability score's a solid 3.7 versus 2.5 on the 2016 Ford Explorer, and the complaint counts back it up — 232 versus 2,412. That's not noise, that's a real gap between rivals built for the same buyer.

If you lean 2016 Ford Explorer, know what you're getting into on steering and body. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2016 GMC Acadia sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2016 GMC Acadia? Watch the airbags and brakes. The 2016 Ford Explorer has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 1.6x higher on the 2016 Ford Explorer. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: pick based on use case more than the spec sheet. If you tow heavy and don't want to think about it, that's one calculation. If you're a daily driver and want the cheapest path forward, that's another. Both of these will get you down the road. We're just telling you where each one is most likely to break.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2016 Ford Explorer
2016 GMC Acadia
steering
524 reports
moderate · ~$700
26 reports
moderate · ~$700
body
534 reports
moderate · ~$1,500
No reports
engine
335 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
4 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
powertrain
196 reports
severe · ~$2,500
19 reports
severe · ~$2,500
airbags
80 reports
severe · ~$1,100
129 reports
severe · ~$1,100
electrical
92 reports
severe · ~$850
21 reports
moderate · ~$850
cruise control
46 reports
moderate · ~$600
No reports
suspension
46 reports
severe · ~$900
No reports
brakes
No reports
3 reports
moderate · ~$450
seatbelts
No reports
3 reports
moderate · ~$500

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2016 Ford Explorer or the 2016 GMC Acadia?

Based on the NHTSA data we track, the 2016 GMC Acadia comes out ahead with a reliability score of 3.7 versus 2.5. The margin is clear, so the verdict could shift if you weight specific categories differently or factor in your own use case.

What goes wrong more often on the 2016 Ford Explorer?

Compared to the 2016 GMC Acadia, the 2016 Ford Explorer sees more reported issues in steering and body. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2016 GMC Acadia?

Compared to the 2016 Ford Explorer, the 2016 GMC Acadia has more complaints in airbags and brakes. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2016 Ford Explorer has more active recalls (6 vs 0). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $14,550 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. Verify each vehicle's federal record: 2016 Ford Explorer on NHTSA · 2016 GMC Acadia on NHTSA. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →
Sponsored — we earn a commission if you complete a quote. Disclosure.