Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Direct rivals · Direct rivals in the full size suv segment

2016 GMC Acadia vs 2016 Honda Pilot

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-06-14 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2016 GMC Acadia clearly comes out ahead on reliability data

Two trucks built for the same buyer, and the data tells a clear story. The 2016 GMC Acadia edges the 2016 Honda Pilot on reliability scoring (3.7 versus 2.8) with meaningful gaps in complaint volume and severity. Real differences, not noise.

More reliable

2016 GMC Acadia

3.7/5
Reliability score
232 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$9,200 repair exposure
vs

2016 Honda Pilot

2.8/5
Reliability score
1,644 complaints
4 recalls (0 critical)
$14,900 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

If I'm picking between these two head-to-head, I'm taking the 2016 GMC Acadia. Reliability score's a solid 3.7 versus 2.8 on the 2016 Honda Pilot, and the complaint counts back it up — 232 versus 1,644. That's not noise, that's a real gap between rivals built for the same buyer.

If you lean 2016 GMC Acadia, know what you're getting into on airbags and steering. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2016 Honda Pilot sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2016 Honda Pilot? Watch the electrical and engine. The 2016 GMC Acadia has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 1.6x higher on the 2016 Honda Pilot. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: pick based on use case more than the spec sheet. If you tow heavy and don't want to think about it, that's one calculation. If you're a daily driver and want the cheapest path forward, that's another. Both of these will get you down the road. We're just telling you where each one is most likely to break.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2016 GMC Acadia
2016 Honda Pilot
electrical
21 reports
moderate · ~$850
527 reports
moderate · ~$850
engine
4 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
479 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
powertrain
19 reports
severe · ~$2,500
192 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
airbags
129 reports
severe · ~$1,100
13 reports
severe · ~$1,100
body
No reports
46 reports
moderate · ~$1,500
steering
26 reports
moderate · ~$700
16 reports
moderate · ~$700
cruise control
No reports
21 reports
severe · ~$600
fuel system
No reports
14 reports
moderate · ~$1,200
brakes
3 reports
moderate · ~$450
No reports
seatbelts
3 reports
moderate · ~$500
No reports

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2016 GMC Acadia or the 2016 Honda Pilot?

Based on the NHTSA data we track, the 2016 GMC Acadia comes out ahead with a reliability score of 3.7 versus 2.8. The margin is clear, so the verdict could shift if you weight specific categories differently or factor in your own use case.

What goes wrong more often on the 2016 GMC Acadia?

Compared to the 2016 Honda Pilot, the 2016 GMC Acadia sees more reported issues in airbags and steering. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2016 Honda Pilot?

Compared to the 2016 GMC Acadia, the 2016 Honda Pilot has more complaints in electrical and engine. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2016 Honda Pilot has more active recalls (4 vs 0). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $14,900 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. Verify each vehicle's federal record: 2016 GMC Acadia on NHTSA · 2016 Honda Pilot on NHTSA. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →
Sponsored — we earn a commission if you complete a quote. Disclosure.