Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Direct rivals · Direct rivals in the compact suv segment

2016 Hyundai Tucson vs 2016 Kia Sportage

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-06-14 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2016 Kia Sportage clearly comes out ahead on reliability data

Two trucks built for the same buyer, and the data tells a clear story. The 2016 Kia Sportage edges the 2016 Hyundai Tucson on reliability scoring (3.8 versus 2.9) with meaningful gaps in complaint volume and severity. Real differences, not noise.

2016 Hyundai Tucson

2.9/5
Reliability score
1,605 complaints
3 recalls (0 critical)
$13,300 repair exposure
vs
More reliable

2016 Kia Sportage

3.8/5
Reliability score
129 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$9,550 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

If I'm picking between these two head-to-head, I'm taking the 2016 Kia Sportage. Reliability score's a solid 3.8 versus 2.9 on the 2016 Hyundai Tucson, and the complaint counts back it up — 129 versus 1,605. That's not noise, that's a real gap between rivals built for the same buyer.

If you lean 2016 Hyundai Tucson, know what you're getting into on powertrain and engine. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2016 Kia Sportage sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2016 Kia Sportage? Watch the brakes and airbags. The 2016 Hyundai Tucson has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 1.4x higher on the 2016 Hyundai Tucson. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: pick based on use case more than the spec sheet. If you tow heavy and don't want to think about it, that's one calculation. If you're a daily driver and want the cheapest path forward, that's another. Both of these will get you down the road. We're just telling you where each one is most likely to break.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2016 Hyundai Tucson
2016 Kia Sportage
powertrain
509 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
6 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
engine
234 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
40 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
body
192 reports
moderate · ~$1,500
No reports
electrical
158 reports
severe · ~$850
16 reports
severe · ~$850
brakes
27 reports
severe · ~$450
33 reports
moderate · ~$450
cruise control
45 reports
severe · ~$600
4 reports
severe · ~$600
steering
22 reports
moderate · ~$700
4 reports
severe · ~$700
visibility
23 reports
moderate · ~$350
No reports
airbags
No reports
4 reports
severe · ~$1,100
lighting
No reports
3 reports
moderate · ~$250

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2016 Hyundai Tucson or the 2016 Kia Sportage?

Based on the NHTSA data we track, the 2016 Kia Sportage comes out ahead with a reliability score of 3.8 versus 2.9. The margin is clear, so the verdict could shift if you weight specific categories differently or factor in your own use case.

What goes wrong more often on the 2016 Hyundai Tucson?

Compared to the 2016 Kia Sportage, the 2016 Hyundai Tucson sees more reported issues in powertrain and engine. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2016 Kia Sportage?

Compared to the 2016 Hyundai Tucson, the 2016 Kia Sportage has more complaints in brakes and airbags. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2016 Hyundai Tucson has more active recalls (3 vs 0). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $13,300 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. Verify each vehicle's federal record: 2016 Hyundai Tucson on NHTSA · 2016 Kia Sportage on NHTSA. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →
Sponsored — we earn a commission if you complete a quote. Disclosure.