Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Direct rivals · Direct rivals in the compact suv segment

2017 Chevrolet Equinox vs 2017 Honda CR-V

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-06-14 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2017 Chevrolet Equinox clearly comes out ahead on reliability data

Two trucks built for the same buyer, and the data tells a clear story. The 2017 Chevrolet Equinox edges the 2017 Honda CR-V on reliability scoring (3.7 versus 3.0) with meaningful gaps in complaint volume and severity. Real differences, not noise.

More reliable

2017 Chevrolet Equinox

3.7/5
Reliability score
270 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$10,900 repair exposure
vs

2017 Honda CR-V

3.0/5
Reliability score
1,723 complaints
2 recalls (0 critical)
$13,750 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

If I'm picking between these two head-to-head, I'm taking the 2017 Chevrolet Equinox. Reliability score's a solid 3.7 versus 3.0 on the 2017 Honda CR-V, and the complaint counts back it up — 270 versus 1,723. That's not noise, that's a real gap between rivals built for the same buyer.

If you lean 2017 Chevrolet Equinox, know what you're getting into on wheels and body. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2017 Honda CR-V sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2017 Honda CR-V? Watch the engine and electrical. The 2017 Chevrolet Equinox has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 1.3x higher on the 2017 Honda CR-V. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: pick based on use case more than the spec sheet. If you tow heavy and don't want to think about it, that's one calculation. If you're a daily driver and want the cheapest path forward, that's another. Both of these will get you down the road. We're just telling you where each one is most likely to break.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2017 Chevrolet Equinox
2017 Honda CR-V
engine
147 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
357 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
electrical
16 reports
severe · ~$850
364 reports
moderate · ~$850
powertrain
30 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
138 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
brakes
No reports
91 reports
severe · ~$450
steering
No reports
57 reports
severe · ~$700
airbags
18 reports
severe · ~$1,100
33 reports
severe · ~$1,100
visibility
8 reports
moderate · ~$350
28 reports
moderate · ~$350
cruise control
4 reports
severe · ~$600
28 reports
moderate · ~$600
wheels
4 reports
moderate · ~$400
No reports
body
3 reports
moderate · ~$1,500
No reports

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2017 Chevrolet Equinox or the 2017 Honda CR-V?

Based on the NHTSA data we track, the 2017 Chevrolet Equinox comes out ahead with a reliability score of 3.7 versus 3.0. The margin is clear, so the verdict could shift if you weight specific categories differently or factor in your own use case.

What goes wrong more often on the 2017 Chevrolet Equinox?

Compared to the 2017 Honda CR-V, the 2017 Chevrolet Equinox sees more reported issues in wheels and body. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2017 Honda CR-V?

Compared to the 2017 Chevrolet Equinox, the 2017 Honda CR-V has more complaints in engine and electrical. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2017 Honda CR-V has more active recalls (2 vs 0). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $13,750 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. Verify each vehicle's federal record: 2017 Chevrolet Equinox on NHTSA · 2017 Honda CR-V on NHTSA. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →
Sponsored — we earn a commission if you complete a quote. Disclosure.