2017 Ford Expedition vs 2017 Nissan Armada
Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.
2017 Ford Expedition
2017 Nissan Armada
Stories from the shop
If I'm picking between these two head-to-head, I'm taking the 2017 Nissan Armada. Reliability score's a solid 4.0 versus 3.5 on the 2017 Ford Expedition, and the complaint counts back it up — 80 versus 350. That's not noise, that's a real gap between rivals built for the same buyer.
If you lean 2017 Ford Expedition, know what you're getting into on electrical and brakes. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2017 Nissan Armada sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.
On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 2.2x higher on the 2017 Ford Expedition. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.
Bottom line: pick based on use case more than the spec sheet. If you tow heavy and don't want to think about it, that's one calculation. If you're a daily driver and want the cheapest path forward, that's another. Both of these will get you down the road. We're just telling you where each one is most likely to break.
Side-by-side by problem area
Common questions
Which is more reliable, the 2017 Ford Expedition or the 2017 Nissan Armada?
Based on the NHTSA data we track, the 2017 Nissan Armada comes out ahead with a reliability score of 4.0 versus 3.5. The margin is clear, so the verdict could shift if you weight specific categories differently or factor in your own use case.
What goes wrong more often on the 2017 Ford Expedition?
Compared to the 2017 Nissan Armada, the 2017 Ford Expedition sees more reported issues in electrical and brakes. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.
What goes wrong more often on the 2017 Nissan Armada?
On the categories we tracked, the 2017 Nissan Armada doesn't show meaningfully more complaints than the 2017 Ford Expedition. The two are running close.
Which has more recalls?
The 2017 Ford Expedition has more active recalls (1 vs 0). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.
Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?
Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $10,800 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.