Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Direct rivals · Direct rivals in the heavy duty truck segment

2017 Ford F-250 vs 2017 RAM 3500

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-08-02 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2017 Ford F-250 clearly comes out ahead on reliability data

Two trucks built for the same buyer, and the data tells a clear story. The 2017 Ford F-250 edges the 2017 RAM 3500 on reliability scoring (3.1 versus 2.3) with meaningful gaps in complaint volume and severity. Real differences, not noise.

More reliable

2017 Ford F-250

3.1/5
Reliability score
1,155 complaints
2 recalls (0 critical)
$13,300 repair exposure
vs

2017 RAM 3500

2.3/5
Reliability score
303 complaints
13 recalls (0 critical)
$9,650 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

If I'm picking between these two head-to-head, I'm taking the 2017 Ford F-250. Reliability score's a solid 3.1 versus 2.3 on the 2017 RAM 3500, and the complaint counts back it up — 1,155 versus 303. That's not noise, that's a real gap between rivals built for the same buyer.

If you lean 2017 Ford F-250, know what you're getting into on steering and suspension. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2017 RAM 3500 sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2017 RAM 3500? Watch the brakes and cruise control. The 2017 Ford F-250 has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 1.4x higher on the 2017 Ford F-250. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: pick based on use case more than the spec sheet. If you tow heavy and don't want to think about it, that's one calculation. If you're a daily driver and want the cheapest path forward, that's another. Both of these will get you down the road. We're just telling you where each one is most likely to break.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2017 Ford F-250
2017 RAM 3500
steering
717 reports
moderate · ~$700
18 reports
moderate · ~$700
suspension
154 reports
moderate · ~$900
11 reports
moderate · ~$900
brakes
No reports
136 reports
moderate · ~$450
electrical
46 reports
severe · ~$850
33 reports
moderate · ~$850
body
47 reports
severe · ~$1,500
No reports
powertrain
20 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
23 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
engine
21 reports
severe · ~$3,100
19 reports
severe · ~$3,100
cruise control
No reports
17 reports
severe · ~$600
wheels
No reports
15 reports
moderate · ~$400
fuel system
12 reports
moderate · ~$1,200
No reports

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2017 Ford F-250 or the 2017 RAM 3500?

Based on the NHTSA data we track, the 2017 Ford F-250 comes out ahead with a reliability score of 3.1 versus 2.3. The margin is clear, so the verdict could shift if you weight specific categories differently or factor in your own use case.

What goes wrong more often on the 2017 Ford F-250?

Compared to the 2017 RAM 3500, the 2017 Ford F-250 sees more reported issues in steering and suspension. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2017 RAM 3500?

Compared to the 2017 Ford F-250, the 2017 RAM 3500 has more complaints in brakes and cruise control. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2017 RAM 3500 has more active recalls (13 vs 2). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $13,300 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. Verify each vehicle's federal record: 2017 Ford F-250 on NHTSA · 2017 RAM 3500 on NHTSA. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Sponsored
Get a free warranty quote →